Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NSEIX (470M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (2.04) vs RMFCX (1.15). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (33 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. NSEIX (9.95). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. NSEIX (19.67).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.216 | 10.283 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.15 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 10.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.64 | 36.31 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.67 | 38.47 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.37 | 92.28 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement