Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NSEIX (462M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (1.52) vs RMFCX (1.16). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (33 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX (9.56) and NSEIX (9.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.05 vs. NSEIX (17.23).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.743 | 8.693 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.16 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 9.56 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | 35.11 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.23 | 37.05 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.17 | 94.22 | 54% |