Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NSEIX (458M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.15). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (33 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSEIX (13.72). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.09 vs. NSEIX (3.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.90 vs. NSEIX (16.39).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.144 | 7.657 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.15 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 4.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.23 | 33.91 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.39 | 34.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.12 | 92.32 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement