NWFL
Price
$33.70
Change
+$0.48 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
369.58M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMBK
Price
$51.01
Change
+$1.15 (+2.31%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
850.82M
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWFL vs SMBK

NWFL vs SMBK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWFL vs. SMBK commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWFL is a Hold and SMBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWFL vs SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
NWFL
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8878
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3914
SMR RATING
1..100
4331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10036
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWFL's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMBK (80). This means that NWFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (39). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (43). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (44). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (100). This means that SMBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWFLSMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (NWFL: $33.22 vs. SMBK: $49.86)
Brand notoriety: NWFL and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWFL: 79% vs. SMBK: 84%
Market capitalization -- NWFL: $369.58M vs. SMBK: $850.82M
NWFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $369.58M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $850.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SMBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWFL and SMBK are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWFL is a better buy in the short-term than SMBK.

Price Growth

NWFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
NWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSRX3.820.13
+3.39%
Nasus Pharma Ltd.
REGCO20.660.26
+1.27%
Regency Centers Corp
PAX10.14-0.01
-0.10%
Patria Investments Limited
ATR120.87-0.29
-0.24%
AptarGroup
LRMR3.06-0.13
-4.23%
Larimar Therapeutics

NWFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been closely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWFL
1D Price
Change %
NWFL100%
+0.54%
SMBK - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
FMBH - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
ORRF - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
HBT - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CZNC - NWFL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
+0.59%
SRCE - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
UVSP - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
HBNC - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
IBCP - SMBK
81%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
ORRF - SMBK
80%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More