Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWLX vs PFIPX
NWWLX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts NWWLX vs PFIPX
NWWLX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWLX vs. PFIPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWLX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. NWWLX (231M). NWWLX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: NWWLX (3.85) vs PFIPX (2.62). NWWLX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: NWWLX (13 years) vs PFIPX (20 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWWLX (0.62). NWWLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.77 vs. PFIPX (23.90). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWLX: PFIPX (0) vs NWWLX (50000). NWWLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. PFIPX (3.11). NWWLX return over 5 years is better than : 7.99 vs. PFIPX (6.55).
| NWWLX | PFIPX | NWWLX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.26 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.26 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.777 | 2.747 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 2.11B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.62 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 3.11 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.39 | 24.61 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 6.55 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.48 | 33.15 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement