Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWWLX vs PIFIX
NWWLX vs PIFIX Comparison
Open Charts NWWLX vs PIFIX
NWWLX vs PIFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWWLX vs. PIFIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWLX is a Hold and PIFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFIX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. NWWLX (231M). NWWLX pays higher dividends than PIFIX: NWWLX (3.85) vs PIFIX (3.11). NWWLX was incepted earlier than PIFIX: NWWLX (13 years) vs PIFIX (20 years). PIFIX (0.73) is less costly to investors than NWWLX (0.62). NWWLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.77 vs. PIFIX (23.90). PIFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWLX: PIFIX (0) vs NWWLX (50000). NWWLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. PIFIX (3.46). PIFIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.06 vs. NWWLX (7.99).
| NWWLX | PIFIX | NWWLX / PIFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.777 | 2.921 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 2.11B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 3.11 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 3.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.39 | 26.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 9.06 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.48 | 40.06 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement