Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. NWZMX (217M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGAGX (0.52) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWZMX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGAGX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.99 vs. NWZMX (-5.38). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 19.07 vs. NWZMX (4.72).
| NWZMX | RGAGX | NWZMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.698 | 9.656 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.38 | 5.99 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.35 | 49.02 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.72 | 19.07 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers