Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWZMX (209M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGAGX (0.51) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWZMX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGAGX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. NWZMX (-10.71). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. NWZMX (2.93).
| NWZMX | RGAGX | NWZMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.349 | 9.321 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.71 | 0.49 | -2,190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.04 | 44.65 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.93 | 15.00 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers