Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGAGX
NWZMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NWZMX (227M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGAGX (0.51) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWZMX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGAGX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. NWZMX (6.45). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. NWZMX (15.35).
| NWZMX | RGAGX | NWZMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.434 | 10.599 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 15.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.83 | 55.31 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.35 | 27.14 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers