Advertisement
O vs PSA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Realty Income Corporation (O) vs. Public Storage (PSA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both O and PSA are S&P 500 real estate investment trusts (REITs) with market capitalizations near $55-60 billion, delivering reliable dividends in the real estate sector.
- O offers a higher dividend yield above 5%, bolstered by its 670th consecutive monthly dividend announcement in recent weeks.
- PSA shows stronger year-to-date gains at 17.4% compared to O's 15.2%, driven by recent earnings beats.
- PSA trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 31.2 versus O's 54.5, suggesting relatively attractive valuation.
- Recent catalysts include PSA's Q1 core FFO (Funds From Operations) growth and acquisition news, alongside O's steady income expansion.
- Tickeron's AI robots provide pattern-based insights applicable to REIT relative performance and market positioning.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits O, a leader in single-tenant net lease properties, against PSA, the dominant self-storage REIT. Both offer defensive real estate exposure with high dividends, appealing to income-focused investors and traders navigating interest rate shifts and economic uncertainty. By examining recent momentum, valuations, and sector dynamics, this analysis highlights contrasts in business models, growth paths, and risk profiles. Investors seeking stable cash flows or growth potential in REITs will find value in understanding their relative performance amid broader market recovery.
O Overview and Recent Performance
Realty Income Corporation (O) operates as "The Monthly Dividend Company," owning over 15,000 properties leased to diversified retail and industrial tenants under long-term net lease agreements. In recent market activity, the stock has risen about 15% year-to-date, trading near its 52-week high of $67.94 with a current price around $63.80. Sentiment has been supported by the announcement of its 670th consecutive monthly dividend and upcoming Q1 earnings on May 6, where analysts expect EPS of $1.10 and revenue of $1.5 billion. Quarterly revenue grew 11% year-over-year, with EPS up 48%, though a high payout ratio of 275% reflects aggressive distribution. Positive analyst updates, including buy ratings with targets up to $75, underscore confidence in its acquisition-driven expansion and resilient occupancy.
PSA Overview and Recent Performance
Public Storage (PSA) is the world's largest self-storage owner and operator, managing over 3,300 facilities across the U.S. The stock has outperformed with 17% year-to-date gains, closing near $301 amid a 52-week range of $256-$313. Recent weeks featured Q1 2026 results beating estimates, with core FFO per share at $4.22 (up 2.4% year-over-year) and revenue of $1.22 billion. A planned acquisition of National Storage Affiliates signals external growth ambitions. Revenue rose 3.2% quarterly, EPS 29%, supported by same-store growth and operational efficiencies. Analyst targets average $312, with recent maintains reflecting optimism despite a 124% payout ratio.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Diverse strategies—such as AI/ML trend following, swing trading, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors—adapt to current volatility. For instance, top bots target sectors like semiconductors and industrials with consistent edges. Traders can explore these for data-driven signals on tickers like O and PSA, enhancing stock comparison decisions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
O and PSA both thrive as equity REITs but diverge in property focus: O's net lease model emphasizes stable retail rents from creditworthy tenants like drugstores, while PSA's self-storage benefits from steady demand less tied to economic cycles. Growth drivers contrast with PSA leveraging M&A (mergers and acquisitions) like its recent deal, versus O's portfolio acquisitions and organic rent escalators. Recent momentum favors PSA on earnings strength, though O excels in yield (5% vs. 4%). Risk profiles show O's lower beta (0.76) for stability but higher payout concerns, against PSA's elevated price-to-book (10.9). Market sentiment remains bullish for both, with real estate sector tailwinds aiding relative performance.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward PSA based on trend consistency from Q1 beats, lower P/E multiples, and acquisition catalysts positioning it for stronger near-term upside. While O offers superior yield and dividend reliability, PSA's relative valuation and momentum provide a probabilistic edge in the prevailing market environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is O is a Buy and PSA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
O’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- O’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PSA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
O’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- O’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.35% price change this week, while PSA (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
O is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
PSA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.48% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+3.25% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| O | PSA | O / PSA | |
| Capitalization | 59.5B | 57.9B | 103% |
| EBITDA | 4.91B | 3.38B | 145% |
| Gain YTD | 16.227 | 29.514 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.67 | 33.08 | 156% |
| Revenue | 5.88B | 4.86B | 121% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 30.2B | 10B | 302% |
O | PSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PSA's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for O (54). This means that PSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (67). This means that PSA’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's SMR Rating (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for O (89). This means that PSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (33). This means that PSA’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (52). This means that PSA’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
| O | PSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 20 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
O and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, O has been closely correlated with NNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if O jumps, then NNN could also see price increases.
PSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSA has been closely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSA jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.