OBDC
Price
$10.77
Change
-$0.22 (-2.00%)
Updated
Jul 20, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.45B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
V
Price
$362.09
Change
+$3.53 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 20, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
681.89B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OBDC vs V

OBDC vs V Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) vs. Visa Inc. (V) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • OBDC is a business development company (BDC) offering a double-digit dividend yield, recently reset to approximately 10%+ at current share prices, but faces earnings headwinds from lower interest rates and tighter credit spreads.
  • Visa (V) is a global payments technology giant with durable revenue growth, a modest ~0.8% dividend yield, and massive share buyback programs that support consistent per-share earnings expansion.
  • These two stocks inhabit entirely different risk-return profiles: OBDC appeals to income-focused investors seeking high current yield, while Visa targets long-term growth investors prioritizing capital appreciation and competitive moat.
  • Recent market activity has seen OBDC under pressure from rate-cycle dynamics, while Visa has benefited from resilient consumer spending and strong cross-border transaction volume growth.
  • Institutional ownership in Visa exceeds 80%, reflecting broad confidence, whereas OBDC's analyst consensus remains mixed following a base dividend reduction in 2026.
  • Tickeron's AI-driven analysis evaluates both stocks across trend consistency, stability, and relative positioning, offering a data-informed perspective on which may be better suited to current market conditions.

Introduction

Comparing OBDC and V is, at its core, a study in contrast. One is a specialty finance company that lends directly to middle-market American businesses and distributes the bulk of its earnings as dividends. The other is a global payments network that processes hundreds of billions of transactions annually across more than 200 countries. This comparison matters to investors who are weighing high current income against durable long-term growth, or who are simply trying to understand how two very different financial-sector stocks behave under the same macroeconomic conditions. By examining business models, recent performance, and market positioning, we can better assess where each stock stands today.

OBDC Overview and Recent Performance

OBDC, or Blue Owl Capital Corporation, is a publicly traded business development company (BDC — a type of investment firm that provides financing to small and midsize companies). Sponsored by Blue Owl Capital, a global alternative asset manager, OBDC originates and manages a diversified portfolio of senior secured loans, unitranche facilities, and other private credit instruments. As of its most recent disclosures, the company held investments across more than 200 portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value exceeding $15 billion.

In recent weeks, OBDC's stock has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range, reflecting a period of earnings compression. The company reported adjusted net investment income (NII — a key profitability metric for BDCs that measures income from investments minus operating expenses) of $0.31 per share for the first quarter of 2026, down from $0.36 in the prior quarter. Management attributed the decline to lower base rates, tighter credit spreads, and reduced fee income from slower deal activity. In response, the board reset the base quarterly dividend to $0.31 per share, aligning it precisely with current earnings. Despite the reset, the annualized dividend yield remains above 10% at prevailing share prices. On the credit-quality front, non-accrual investments declined sequentially, and Moody's upgraded OBDC's rating to Baa2 in January 2026 — signaling confidence in its balance sheet strength.

V Overview and Recent Performance

V, or Visa Inc., operates the world's largest retail electronic payment network. Its VisaNet platform processes payment authorizations, clearing, and settlement for credit, debit, and prepaid cards, as well as digital wallet and tokenized transactions. Unlike a bank, Visa does not extend credit; it earns fees from financial institutions and merchants based on transaction volumes processed across its network. For fiscal year 2025, Visa generated approximately $40 billion in net revenue and delivered non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $11.47.

Recent market activity has placed Visa shares roughly in the middle of their 52-week range, with the stock holding above $330. The company has continued to post healthy business-driver trends, including payments volume growth of 8–9%, cross-border volume growth of 11–13%, and processed transaction growth of approximately 10% year over year. In late 2025, Visa raised its quarterly dividend by 14% to $0.67 per share and maintained an aggressive share repurchase program — buying back $22.8 billion of stock in fiscal 2025 alone. Analysts remain broadly constructive, with multiple firms issuing Buy or Outperform ratings and an average price target near $400. Institutional ownership stands above 80%, reinforcing Visa's status as a core portfolio holding for many large investors.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating stocks like OBDC and V, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equity markets, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots span a wide variety of trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from short-term momentum algorithms to longer-term trend-following systems. Many of the featured bots have generated notable historical returns, and each is fully transparent in its performance statistics, trade history, and ticker focus. Browsing the Trending AI Robots section can help traders and investors discover automated strategies that match their own risk tolerance and market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking difference between OBDC and V lies in their economic sensitivity and income profiles. OBDC's earnings are directly tied to floating-rate loan yields and credit spreads; when the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, the company's net investment income faces immediate pressure — as seen in recent quarters. Visa, by contrast, benefits from nominal transaction volumes that tend to correlate with overall consumer spending and global GDP growth. Its revenue stream is largely fee-based and does not depend on interest-rate spreads, giving it a fundamentally different risk profile.

From a capital-return standpoint, OBDC distributes nearly all taxable income as dividends, producing a yield that currently exceeds 10%. Visa's dividend yield, at under 1%, appears negligible by comparison — but the company's total shareholder return is heavily augmented by enormous buyback programs that reduce share count and amplify EPS growth over time. On valuation, Visa trades at a premium earnings multiple (approximately 27–30 times trailing earnings), reflecting its wide economic moat and reliable growth. OBDC trades at a discount to net asset value (NAV), with shares recently priced near 86% of book value — a metric that income investors often watch closely. Risk factors also diverge: OBDC faces credit risk from borrower defaults, while Visa contends with regulatory scrutiny, litigation over interchange fees, and competition from alternative payment rails.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market factors, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find a more favorable near-term setup in V relative to OBDC. Visa's trend consistency across multiple timeframes, supported by steady transaction volume growth and durable business drivers, offers the kind of stability that trend-following algorithms tend to favor. While OBDC's elevated dividend yield and discounted price-to-NAV ratio present a compelling value case, the recent earnings compression and dividend reset introduce uncertainty that may give AI models pause. That said, for AI bots specializing in mean-reversion or high-yield income strategies, OBDC could present an attractive entry point, particularly if credit spreads continue to widen and deployment opportunities improve. The divergence between these two stocks underscores the importance of matching any investment — or AI trading strategy — to one's specific objectives, whether that means prioritizing yield, growth, or risk-adjusted returns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OBDC vs. V commentary
Jul 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBDC is a Hold and V is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2026
Stock price -- (OBDC: $10.99 vs. V: $358.56)
Brand notoriety: OBDC: Not notable vs. V: Notable
OBDC represents the Investment Managers, while V is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBDC: 87% vs. V: 85%
Market capitalization -- OBDC: $5.45B vs. V: $681.89B
OBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.45B. V’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $681.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.19B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.59B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBDC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileV’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OBDC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • V’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OBDC is a better buy in the long-term than V.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OBDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while V’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OBDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • V’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OBDC is a better buy in the short-term than V.

Price Growth

OBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while V (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

OBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

V is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.02% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Savings Banks (-0.44% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
V($682B) has a higher market cap than OBDC($5.45B). V has higher P/E ratio than OBDC: V (31.26) vs OBDC (15.70). V YTD gains are higher at: 2.662 vs. OBDC (-5.858). V has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. OBDC (442M). OBDC has less debt than V: OBDC (8.46B) vs V (24B). V has higher revenues than OBDC: V (43B) vs OBDC (445M).
OBDCVOBDC / V
Capitalization5.45B682B1%
EBITDAN/A28.4B-
Gain YTD-5.8582.662-220%
P/E Ratio15.7031.2650%
Revenue445M43B1%
Total Cash442M13.9B3%
Total Debt8.46B24B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OBDC vs V: Fundamental Ratings
OBDC
V
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5227
SMR RATING
1..100
3218
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5829
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1563
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OBDC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for V (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than V’s over the last 12 months.

V's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OBDC (52) in the null industry. This means that V’s stock grew similarly to OBDC’s over the last 12 months.

V's SMR Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OBDC (32) in the null industry. This means that V’s stock grew similarly to OBDC’s over the last 12 months.

V's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OBDC (58) in the null industry. This means that V’s stock grew similarly to OBDC’s over the last 12 months.

OBDC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for V (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than V’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OBDCV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OBDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
V
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYX26.530.37
+1.41%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF
SKOR48.17N/A
N/A
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corp Bd ETF
USFI24.41N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL-U.S. Fixed Income ETF
ACWI157.68N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
SIXJ36.48-0.16
-0.45%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Jan/Jul ETF

OBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OBDC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OBDC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OBDC
1D Price
Change %
OBDC100%
-1.79%
ARCC - OBDC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
BXSL - OBDC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
GBDC - OBDC
74%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
MSDL - OBDC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
NCDL - OBDC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
More

V and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, V has been closely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if V jumps, then MA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To V
1D Price
Change %
V100%
-1.80%
MA - V
84%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
OBDC - V
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
OCSL - V
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
AER - V
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
AXP - V
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
More