OCSL
Price
$13.65
Change
-$0.10 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
85 days until earnings call
SLMBP
Price
$75.90
Change
-$0.14 (-0.18%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCSL vs SLMBP

Header iconOCSL vs SLMBP Comparison
Open Charts OCSL vs SLMBPBanner chart's image
Oaktree Specialty Lending
Price$13.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.73%)
Volume$432.7K
Capitalization1.2B
SLM
Price$75.90
Change-$0.14 (-0.18%)
Volume$1.38K
CapitalizationN/A
OCSL vs SLMBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCSL vs. SLMBP commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCSL is a StrongBuy and SLMBP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OCSL: $13.65 vs. SLMBP: $75.90)
Brand notoriety: OCSL and SLMBP are both not notable
OCSL represents the Investment Managers, while SLMBP is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCSL: 70% vs. SLMBP: 20%
Market capitalization -- OCSL: $1.2B vs. SLMBP: $0
OCSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.2B. SLMBP’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $176.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $677.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLMBP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OCSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLMBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the long-term than SLMBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCSL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLMBP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCSL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLMBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OCSL and SLMBP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OCSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while SLMBP (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Savings Banks (+2.09% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMBP YTD gains are higher at: 6.902 vs. OCSL (-5.144). OCSL has less debt than SLMBP: OCSL (1.45B) vs SLMBP (6.41B). SLMBP has higher revenues than OCSL: SLMBP (1.76B) vs OCSL (35.8M).
OCSLSLMBPOCSL / SLMBP
Capitalization1.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.1446.902-75%
P/E Ratio24.12N/A-
Revenue35.8M1.76B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.45B6.41B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCSL vs SLMBP: Fundamental Ratings
OCSL
SLMBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
424
SMR RATING
1..100
36100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLMBP's Valuation (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OCSL (6) in the null industry. This means that SLMBP’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

SLMBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCSL (42) in the null industry. This means that SLMBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLMBP (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLMBP’s over the last 12 months.

SLMBP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OCSL (61) in the null industry. This means that SLMBP’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLMBP (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew significantly faster than SLMBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCSLSLMBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIQVX37.37N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs Z
LIGYX11.70N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles International Growth Y
CHDEX14.37-0.10
-0.69%
Cullen High Dividend Equity Retail
DHLAX34.13-0.24
-0.70%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Inv
ADNPX20.25-0.24
-1.17%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov Inv

OCSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with TSLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then TSLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCSL
1D Price
Change %
OCSL100%
-0.73%
TSLX - OCSL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
NMFC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BCSF - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
SLRC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
OBDC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More

SLMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLMBP has been loosely correlated with RWAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLMBP jumps, then RWAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLMBP
1D Price
Change %
SLMBP100%
-0.18%
RWAY - SLMBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
OBDC - SLMBP
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
FTAIN - SLMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
OCSL - SLMBP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
GATX - SLMBP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More