OFG
Price
$52.40
Change
-$0.03 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.21B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHFS
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OFG vs SHFS

OFG vs SHFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OFG vs. SHFS commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFG is a Hold and SHFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (OFG: $52.40 vs. SHFS: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: OFG and SHFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OFG: 99% vs. SHFS: 1%
Market capitalization -- OFG: $2.21B vs. SHFS: $1.25M
OFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.21B. SHFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OFG is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHFS is a better buy in the short-term than OFG.

Price Growth

OFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OFG($2.22B) has a higher market cap than SHFS($1.25M). OFG has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: OFG (10.34) vs SHFS (0.98). OFG YTD gains are higher at: 29.924 vs. SHFS (-81.689). SHFS has less debt than OFG: SHFS (667K) vs OFG (479M). OFG has higher revenues than SHFS: OFG (688M) vs SHFS (10.9M).
OFGSHFSOFG / SHFS
Capitalization2.22B1.25M176,776%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.924-81.689-37%
P/E Ratio10.340.981,051%
Revenue688M10.9M6,312%
Total Cash632MN/A-
Total Debt479M667K71,814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFG: Fundamental Ratings
OFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OFGSHFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGME60.340.41
+0.68%
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
CPSO27.96N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Oct
HOOG36.93N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
PPLT14.43-0.03
-0.21%
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
ILDR36.27-0.54
-1.45%
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF

OFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFG has been closely correlated with FBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OFG jumps, then FBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFG
1D Price
Change %
OFG100%
-0.06%
FBP - OFG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BPOP - OFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CATY - OFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
GSBC - OFG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
FFBC - OFG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and FBP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and FBP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
-4.48%
FBP - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
WAL - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
OFG - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
TCBI - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
COLB - SHFS
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
More