Advertisement
OLO vs ONTO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Buy and ONTO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OLO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileONTO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OLO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ONTO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONTO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ONTO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.86% price change this week, while ONTO (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
OLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
ONTO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.31% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Semiconductors (-0.49% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| OLO | ONTO | OLO / ONTO | |
| Capitalization | 889M | 9.1B | 10% |
| EBITDA | -47.56M | 183M | -26% |
| Gain YTD | 12.240 | -42.695 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.87 | 75.33 | 13% |
| Revenue | 228M | 816M | 28% |
| Total Cash | 363M | 698M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 18.9M | 19.5M | 97% |
OLO | ONTO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ONTO's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (82). This means that ONTO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
ONTO's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (91). This means that ONTO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
ONTO's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (89). This means that ONTO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONTO (93). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONTO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONTO (98). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONTO’s over the last 12 months.
| OLO | ONTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
OLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLO | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| QTWO - OLO | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| EVCM - OLO | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| SHOP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| AMPL - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.09% | ||
| BRZE - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with CAMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then CAMT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | +2.96% | ||
| CAMT - ONTO | 75% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| VECO - ONTO | 74% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 74% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 72% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| AMAT - ONTO | 71% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
More | ||||