OLO
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.74B
61 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.82
Change
+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.92B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OLO vs QTWO

Header iconOLO vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts OLO vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Olo
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$37.7K
Capitalization1.74B
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.82
Change+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Volume$7.1K
Capitalization4.92B
OLO vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLO vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OLO: $10.26 vs. QTWO: $77.27)
Brand notoriety: OLO and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLO: 50% vs. QTWO: 85%
Market capitalization -- OLO: $1.74B vs. QTWO: $4.92B
OLO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.74B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.92B) has a higher market cap than OLO($1.74B). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than OLO: QTWO (1313.50) vs OLO (1036.00). OLO YTD gains are higher at: 33.594 vs. QTWO (-23.229). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. OLO (16.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. OLO (377M). OLO has less debt than QTWO: OLO (12.7M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than OLO: QTWO (743M) vs OLO (314M).
OLOQTWOOLO / QTWO
Capitalization1.74B4.92B35%
EBITDA16.6M77.5M21%
Gain YTD33.594-23.229-145%
P/E Ratio1036.001313.5079%
Revenue314M743M42%
Total Cash377M532M71%
Total Debt12.7M539M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLO vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
OLO
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
193
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLOQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVASX23.950.15
+0.63%
American Beacon Large Cap Value Adv
SPIIX104.54N/A
N/A
SEI S&P 500 Index I (SIMT)
MFEIX217.54N/A
N/A
MFS Growth I
ADAVX4.61N/A
N/A
abrdn Dynamic Dividend A
EKSRX6.18N/A
N/A
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr R6

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
-0.10%
SHOP - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
QTWO - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
HUBS - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
COMP - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
EVCM - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.17%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
ALKT - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More