OMF
Price
$41.06
Change
-$3.68 (-8.23%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
19 days until earnings call
WSC
Price
$23.63
Change
-$2.07 (-8.05%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.83B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OMF vs WSC

Header iconOMF vs WSC Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WSCBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$41.06
Change-$3.68 (-8.23%)
Volume$5.22K
Capitalization6.02B
WillScot Holdings
Price$23.63
Change-$2.07 (-8.05%)
Volume$589.81K
Capitalization8.83B
OMF vs WSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WSC commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and WSC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $44.74 vs. WSC: $25.70)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 240% vs. WSC: 103%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. WSC: $8.83B
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. WSC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OMF and WSC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -11.39% price change this week, while WSC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -12.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -6.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

WSC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-6.31% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSC($8.83B) has a higher market cap than OMF($6.02B). WSC has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WSC (26.13) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: -12.573 vs. WSC (-22.990). WSC has less debt than OMF: WSC (3.8B) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than WSC: OMF (4.28B) vs WSC (2.37B).
OMFWSCOMF / WSC
Capitalization6.02B8.83B68%
EBITDAN/A1.01B-
Gain YTD-12.573-22.99055%
P/E Ratio9.4426.1336%
Revenue4.28B2.37B181%
Total CashN/A11M-
Total Debt19.8B3.8B521%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WSC: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2959
SMR RATING
1..100
788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5181
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSC (90). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WSC (59). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSC (88). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WSC (81). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (32). This means that WSC’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSQ42.182.16
+5.40%
ProShares Short QQQ
SHM47.710.13
+0.27%
SPDR® Nuveen Blmbg ST MunBd ETF
XHYC36.89N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF
TYO13.06-0.42
-3.12%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bear 3X ETF
NANC34.66-1.79
-4.91%
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-11.55%
ENVA - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
-11.10%
COF - OMF
73%
Closely correlated
-9.96%
SLM - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
-9.19%
DFS - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
-8.34%
AXP - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
-9.97%
More

WSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSC has been loosely correlated with MGRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSC jumps, then MGRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSC
1D Price
Change %
WSC100%
-11.35%
MGRC - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.36%
URI - WSC
52%
Loosely correlated
-8.51%
AL - WSC
50%
Loosely correlated
-9.67%
ENVA - WSC
49%
Loosely correlated
-11.10%
OMF - WSC
48%
Loosely correlated
-11.55%
More