OND
Price
$34.11
Change
-$0.42 (-1.22%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Net Assets
3.42M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLY
Price
$113.75
Change
-$1.19 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OND vs XLY

OND vs XLY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) vs. State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY)

Key Takeaways

  • OND offers targeted thematic exposure to the global on-demand economy with 26 holdings, while XLY provides broad U.S. large-cap consumer discretionary sector coverage with 48 holdings.
  • XLY features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to OND's 0.58%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • OND emphasizes high-growth areas like digital media, e-gaming, and ridesharing (e.g., top holdings NVDA, EA), contrasting XLY's concentration in mega-caps like AMZN (28%) and TSLA (20%).
  • Both funds operate in consumer discretionary spaces but OND adds international diversification and higher volatility due to its thematic focus.
  • XLY demonstrates superior liquidity with higher average daily volume and tighter bid-ask spreads, suiting active traders.
  • In recent market cycles, XLY has shown more stable relative positioning tied to broad sector trends, while OND's performance hinges on on-demand innovation momentum.

Introduction

Comparing ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) highlights distinct approaches within the consumer discretionary landscape. OND targets the niche, high-growth on-demand services theme, capturing global innovators in digital delivery and lifestyle access. XLY, meanwhile, offers comprehensive exposure to U.S. large-cap consumer discretionary firms from the S&P 500. These ETFs appeal to investors seeking either thematic upside or broad sector stability amid shifting consumer behaviors, interest rate expectations, and economic cycles. As capital rotates toward cyclicals, understanding their structural differences aids in portfolio positioning for sector exposure and relative performance dynamics.

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) Overview

The ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is a passive thematic fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index. Launched in October 2021, it invests in a global portfolio of companies providing on-demand access to lifestyle needs, such as digital media, e-gaming, food delivery, ridesharing, fitness, and virtual reality. With approximately 26 holdings, OND maintains a concentrated structure emphasizing innovation leaders.

Top holdings include NVDA (6.55%), EA (5.33%), Capcom Co Ltd (5.12%), TTWO (4.86%), and Delivery Hero SE (4.72%). Sector allocations tilt toward communication services (around 60%), technology (23%), and consumer cyclical (15%), with significant international exposure including Asian gaming and delivery firms.

OND's expense ratio is 0.58%, reflecting its specialized strategy. As a non-diversified fund, it carries elevated volatility from emerging trends, competition, and regulatory risks in on-demand platforms. Liquidity is solid with a 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.35%.

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) Overview

The State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) is a passive index fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, comprising large-cap U.S. firms from the S&P 500. Inception in December 1998 underscores its established role in sector rotation strategies.

Featuring 48 holdings, XLY is market-cap weighted with heavy concentration in top names: AMZN (27.75%), TSLA (20.73%), HD (5.14%), TJX (3.76%), and MCD (3.62%). Allocations span broadline retail (29%), automobiles (23%), hotels/restaurants/leisure (22%), and specialty retail (19%), delivering pure consumer discretionary exposure.

At an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.08%, XLY prioritizes cost efficiency. Its structure supports high liquidity (30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01%) and quarterly rebalancing aligned with the S&P 500, minimizing tracking error while offering options availability.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer discretionary sector faces mixed pressures from moderating inflation, potential interest rate cuts, and geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains. Higher-income households sustain spending on travel, retail, and durables, benefiting discount retailers and home improvement amid housing revival prospects. However, value-conscious consumers amid elevated rates curb non-essentials, prompting outflows from broad discretionary ETFs in early 2026 cycles.

On-demand themes thrive on digital adoption, with e-gaming, streaming, and delivery platforms drawing capital despite regulatory scrutiny in regions like Asia. Sector rotation favors cyclicals like energy over discretionary, but anticipated rate relief could catalyze recovery. Risks include tariff hikes and softening real incomes, emphasizing resilience in diversified holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months through early 2026, XLY has maintained steadier positioning amid sector outflows, buoyed by mega-cap anchors like AMZN and TSLA during earnings cycles and EV momentum. Its lower volatility suits broad market rotations, correlating closely with S&P 500 trends.

OND, tied to thematic growth, exhibits higher beta from holdings like NVDA in AI-driven gaming and global delivery amid commodity and tech shifts. Relative to XLY, OND shows amplified swings from interest rate sensitivity and international exposures, positioning it for outperformance in innovation-led rallies but underperformance in risk-off environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLY due to its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification within U.S. large-caps, ample liquidity, and consistent trend alignment in recent cycles. While OND's thematic edge offers probabilistic upside in on-demand growth, XLY's structural advantages and lower risk exposure position it as the more robust choice for sustained sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OND vs. XLY commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OND is a Hold and XLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLY has more net assets: 22B vs. OND (3.42M). XLY has a higher annual dividend yield than OND: XLY (-3.358) vs OND (-17.095). OND was incepted earlier than XLY: OND (5 years) vs XLY (28 years). XLY (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover XLY (10.00) vs XLY (10.00).
ONDXLYOND / XLY
Gain YTD-17.095-3.358509%
Net Assets3.42M22B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.08725%
Turnover36.0010.00360%
Yield0.000.74-
Fund Existence5 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONDXLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMBA70.740.77
+1.10%
Ambarella
CIB81.28-0.17
-0.21%
Grupo Cibest SA
SSM3.86-0.05
-1.28%
Sono Group NV
DC4.60-0.33
-6.69%
Dakota Gold Corp
SRFM1.07-0.10
-8.55%
Surf Air Mobility

OND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OND
1D Price
Change %
OND100%
N/A
BMBL - OND
52%
Loosely correlated
-5.74%
TME - OND
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.47%
RBLX - OND
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.27%
CART - OND
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
PTON - OND
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
More

XLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLY has been loosely correlated with ETSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLY jumps, then ETSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLY
1D Price
Change %
XLY100%
-1.70%
ETSY - XLY
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
WHR - XLY
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.89%
UA - XLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
UAA - XLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
BBWI - XLY
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.52%
More