ONON
Price
$42.67
Change
-$0.50 (-1.16%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
RL
Price
$203.26
Change
+$1.51 (+0.75%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
12B
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ONON vs RL

Header iconONON vs RL Comparison
Open Charts ONON vs RLBanner chart's image
On Holding AG
Price$42.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.16%)
Volume$3.9M
Capitalization11.23B
Ralph Lauren
Price$203.26
Change+$1.51 (+0.75%)
Volume$972.92K
Capitalization12B
ONON vs RL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ONON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONON vs. RL commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONON is a Buy and RL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ONON: $43.17 vs. RL: $201.75)
Brand notoriety: ONON and RL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONON: 79% vs. RL: 80%
Market capitalization -- ONON: $11.23B vs. RL: $12B
ONON [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $11.23B. RL’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONON’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the long-term than ONON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ONON and RL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ONON (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +5.37% price change this week, while RL (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +4.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONON is expected to report earnings on May 17, 2023.

RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+3.30% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RL($12B) has a higher market cap than ONON($11.2B). ONON has higher P/E ratio than RL: ONON (127.11) vs RL (20.93). RL YTD gains are higher at: -11.677 vs. ONON (-22.092). RL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. ONON (141M). RL has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. ONON (529M). ONON has less debt than RL: ONON (229M) vs RL (2.76B). RL has higher revenues than ONON: RL (6.6B) vs ONON (1.79B).
ONONRLONON / RL
Capitalization11.2B12B93%
EBITDA141M983M14%
Gain YTD-22.092-11.677189%
P/E Ratio127.1120.93607%
Revenue1.79B6.6B27%
Total Cash529M1.92B28%
Total Debt229M2.76B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RL: Fundamental Ratings
RL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONONRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ONON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTSI37.110.35
+0.96%
WisdomTree International Efficnt Cr ETF
FPXI46.980.29
+0.62%
First Trust International Eq Opps ETF
AGG97.810.20
+0.20%
iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF
USML35.19N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mn Vl Fct TR ETN
FIDU66.21-0.24
-0.36%
Fidelity MSCI Industrials ETF

ONON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONON has been closely correlated with DECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONON jumps, then DECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONON
1D Price
Change %
ONON100%
-1.16%
DECK - ONON
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
SKX - ONON
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
RL - ONON
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
VFC - ONON
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.82%
SHOO - ONON
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
More

RL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been closely correlated with PVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RL jumps, then PVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RL
1D Price
Change %
RL100%
+0.75%
PVH - RL
70%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
SKX - RL
67%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
SHOO - RL
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
DECK - RL
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VFC - RL
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.82%
More