ONON
Price
$36.21
Change
-$2.67 (-6.87%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UAA
Price
$5.91
Change
-$0.15 (-2.48%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONON vs UAA

ONON vs UAA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? On Holding AG (ONON) vs. Under Armour (UAA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ONON has delivered stronger year-to-date gains at around 28%, outpacing the S&P 500, while UAA shows minimal YTD growth near 0% amid earnings challenges.
  • Recent market activity reflects volatility for both, with ONON trading near its 52-week low after leadership changes, and UAA experiencing a sharp post-earnings drop.
  • ONON's premium positioning in performance footwear drives consistent revenue growth, contrasting UAA's struggles with wholesale contraction and profitability.
  • Market caps differ significantly: ONON at over $11 billion versus UAA around $2 billion, highlighting scale differences in the athletic apparel sector.
  • Analyst sentiment leans positive for ONON with higher price targets, while UAA faces downgrades amid weak outlook.

Introduction

In the competitive athletic apparel and footwear sector, ONON and UAA represent contrasting approaches to growth and market positioning. On Holding AG focuses on premium performance products, while Under Armour emphasizes broad performance gear. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, business models, and relative strengths, aiding traders seeking momentum plays and investors evaluating long-term sector exposure. Amid shifting consumer preferences toward innovative running and training gear, understanding these dynamics supports informed decisions on relative performance and market positioning.

ONON Overview and Recent Performance

On Holding AG (ONON), a Swiss-based innovator in performance sports products, specializes in athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories under the On brand. Known for its CloudTec cushioning technology, the company targets runners, outdoor enthusiasts, and everyday athletes through wholesale and direct-to-consumer (DTC) channels, including e-commerce and owned stores. In recent market activity, ONON shares have hovered around $33-34, near the lower end of a 52-week range of $31.41-$61.29, reflecting broader sector volatility and foreign exchange headwinds. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 28%, outperforming the S&P 500's 26% over one year. Sentiment has been influenced by Q1 2026 earnings beats, raised profit forecasts, and leadership transitions with founders resuming co-CEO roles, alongside sustained demand despite price increases. These factors underscore ONON's resilience in premium segments.

UAA Overview and Recent Performance

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA), headquartered in Baltimore, develops and markets performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth under brands like HEATGEAR and COLDGEAR. The company distributes via wholesale to sporting goods chains and DTC through stores and e-commerce, emphasizing compression and fitted gear for training and casual use. Recent weeks have seen heightened volatility, with shares dropping sharply to around $5 post-Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings, which reported losses and missed projections despite some revenue tops. The stock trades in a 52-week range of $4.13-$8.15, with YTD returns near flat at 0.1% and one-year gains of 20% trailing the S&P 500. Key influences include ongoing wholesale exits, inventory management, and a cautious fiscal 2027 outlook amid North American softness, tempering investor sentiment despite brand revitalization efforts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's most promising AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Out of 351 total AI bots, 25 top performers are highlighted as trending, selected by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions. These bots showcase diverse trading styles, including real-time signal agents for copy trading (with or without risk management), strategies based on technical or fundamental analysis, and varying timeframes like 5-minute, 15-minute, or 60-minute intervals. Performance stats include annualized returns up to 227-279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 2.5-12.5, focusing on momentum, sector rotation, and volatility levels from low to high. Traders can explore these for intermediate to expert plans, adapting to sectors like technology, energy, and industrials. Visit Trending AI Robots to review and deploy bots tailored to today's opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ONON and UAA operate in the athletic apparel sector but diverge in business models: ONON emphasizes premium, innovation-driven footwear with expanding apparel lines and global DTC growth, while UAA pursues broad performance gear amid wholesale optimization and North America focus. Growth drivers for ONON include strong constant-currency revenue expansion and market share gains in running, contrasting UAA's challenges with revenue contraction and profitability pressures. Recent momentum favors ONON's earnings beats over UAA's misses. Risk factors highlight ONON's exposure to currency fluctuations and leadership shifts versus UAA's competitive intensity and regional dependence. Sector exposure aligns in consumer cyclical, but ONON benefits from premium sentiment, while UAA trades at lower multiples amid turnaround efforts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ONON due to superior trend consistency in revenue growth, positive earnings momentum, and stronger relative positioning in the premium athletic segment. Factors like outperformance against benchmarks and higher analyst targets suggest greater upside probability, though UAA could rebound with successful restructuring. This assessment reflects observable market data rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ONON vs. UAA commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONON is a StrongBuy and UAA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ONON: $36.21 vs. UAA: $5.91)
Brand notoriety: ONON and UAA are both not notable
ONON represents the Wholesale Distributors, while UAA is part of the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONON: 140% vs. UAA: 66%
Market capitalization -- ONON: $12.07B vs. UAA: $2.48B
ONON [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $12.07B. UAA’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $63.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $27.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $7.93B. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $3.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONON’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ONON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UAA is a better buy in the long-term than ONON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONON’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UAA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UAA is a better buy in the short-term than ONON.

Price Growth

ONON (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -6.41% price change this week, while UAA (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -5.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

UAA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-5.59% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

@Apparel/Footwear (-0.64% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONON($12.1B) has a higher market cap than UAA($2.48B). ONON has higher P/E ratio than UAA: ONON (38.98) vs UAA (20.95). UAA YTD gains are higher at: 18.913 vs. ONON (-22.096). ONON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416M vs. UAA (74.2M). ONON has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. UAA (309M). ONON has less debt than UAA: ONON (542M) vs UAA (1.94B). UAA has higher revenues than ONON: UAA (4.97B) vs ONON (3.12B).
ONONUAAONON / UAA
Capitalization12.1B2.48B487%
EBITDA416M74.2M561%
Gain YTD-22.09618.913-117%
P/E Ratio38.9820.95186%
Revenue3.12B4.97B63%
Total Cash1.09B309M353%
Total Debt542M1.94B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UAA: Fundamental Ratings
UAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONONUAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LU1.25N/A
N/A
Lufax Holding Ltd
YORW29.49-0.04
-0.14%
York Water Company
GFL35.00-0.10
-0.28%
GFL Environmental
TRUG1.34-0.01
-0.74%
TruGolf Holdings Inc.
LFVN6.08-0.33
-5.15%
Lifevantage Corp

ONON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONON has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONON jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONON
1D Price
Change %
ONON100%
-6.87%
RL - ONON
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
VFC - ONON
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
DECK - ONON
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
GIL - ONON
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
UA - ONON
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
More

UAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAA has been closely correlated with UA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UAA jumps, then UA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAA
1D Price
Change %
UAA100%
-2.48%
UA - UAA
99%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
NKE - UAA
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.45%
COLM - UAA
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
SHOO - UAA
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
ONON - UAA
45%
Loosely correlated
-6.87%
More