Advertisement
OR vs PAAS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? OR Royalties Inc. (OR) vs. Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- OR Royalties Inc. (OR) operates a low-risk royalty and streaming model in precious metals, offering stable revenue without operational costs.
- Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is a leading silver and gold producer with significant operational leverage to rising metal prices.
- PAAS has delivered superior one-year returns of over 117%, far outpacing OR's approximately 56% gain.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks trading near midpoints of 52-week ranges amid volatility in gold and silver prices, with year-to-date gains around 1-2%.
- PAAS boasts a larger market capitalization of about $22 billion compared to OR's $6.9 billion.
- Analyst price targets suggest similar upside potential of around 35-40% for both stocks from recent levels.
Introduction
OR Royalties Inc. (OR) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) represent distinct approaches within the precious metals sector, with OR focusing on royalties and streams and PAAS on direct production. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to gold and silver amid elevated metal prices driven by economic uncertainty and inflation hedges. Traders monitoring relative performance may find value in evaluating their momentum, valuations, and risk profiles in the current market environment.
OR Overview and Recent Performance
OR Royalties Inc. (OR) is a precious metals royalty and streaming company, earning revenue from percentage royalties and metal streams on third-party mining operations without bearing direct production costs. This model provides leverage to gold and silver prices while minimizing operational risks. In recent market activity, OR shares have traded around $37, within a 52-week range of $22.40 to $48.06, reflecting a year-to-date gain of about 2.24%. Sentiment has been supported by strong earnings growth of over 1,100% in the past year and positive analyst views, including outperform ratings, amid rising metal prices. Broader precious metals trends and portfolio expansions have influenced steady performance, though shares remain below recent highs.
PAAS Overview and Recent Performance
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is one of the world's largest silver producers, with diversified gold output from multiple mines across the Americas. Its business benefits from direct exposure to silver and gold price movements, enhanced by operational efficiencies. Recently, PAAS shares have hovered near $52, in a 52-week range of $22.08 to $69.99, with year-to-date returns around 1.41% following a robust one-year gain of 117%. Key drivers include record quarterly revenue exceeding estimates and positive developments like production updates and analyst upgrades. Elevated silver prices and cost controls, such as all-in sustaining costs (AISC, a key mining profitability metric) below peers, have bolstered sentiment, despite short-term volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots—over 350 in total—that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. The curated Trending AI Robots section spotlights the top 25 performers suited to current market conditions, featuring annualized returns up to +163%, win rates reaching 88%, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17. These bots employ AI/ML models on timeframes from 60 minutes to 49 days, trading sectors like metals miners, semiconductors, and leveraged ETFs with take-profit/stop-loss corridors for risk management. Examples include high-conviction plays on gold/silver miners and energy stocks. Investors can explore these bots to align automated strategies with their risk tolerance and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
OR and PAAS both capitalize on precious metals strength but differ in business models: OR's royalty structure delivers predictable cash flows with lower volatility, while PAAS's producing assets offer higher upside from volume growth and cost efficiencies but expose it to mining risks like AISC fluctuations and geopolitical factors. Growth drivers contrast as well—OR expands via acquisitions, projecting 18% annual revenue growth, versus PAAS's production ramps and exploration successes. Recent momentum favors PAAS with explosive yearly gains, though OR shows relative price strength. Risk profiles highlight OR's stability (higher PE ratio of 34 versus PAAS's 20) amid sector exposure to silver/gold sentiment shifts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PAAS based on stronger trend consistency over the past year, recent positive earnings surprises, and bullish momentum indicators like upward analyst revisions. While OR offers attractive stability, PAAS's catalysts and relative positioning suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance in a favorable metals environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OR is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
OR (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.49% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -8.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-8.01% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| OR | PAAS | OR / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 6.02B | 19.1B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 339M | 2.22B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | -10.966 | -11.757 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.29 | 15.43 | 164% |
| Revenue | 325M | 4B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 94.9M | 1.61B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 4.64M | 845M | 1% |
OR | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (72) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.
OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's SMR Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OR (47) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OR (61) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OR (99) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.
| OR | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
OR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.