OWL
Price
$16.68
Change
+$0.37 (+2.27%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
WHG
Price
$16.74
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
157.49M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs WHG

Header iconOWL vs WHG Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs WHGBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.68
Change+$0.37 (+2.27%)
Volume$12.13M
Capitalization10.86B
Westwood Holdings Group
Price$16.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$2.74K
Capitalization157.49M
OWL vs WHG Comparison Chart in %
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. WHG commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Buy and WHG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $16.68 vs. WHG: $16.74)
Brand notoriety: OWL and WHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 116% vs. WHG: 28%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $10.86B vs. WHG: $157.49M
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.86B. WHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $157.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $176.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than WHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than WHG.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.09% price change this week, while WHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.79% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($10.9B) has a higher market cap than WHG($157M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than WHG: OWL (151.64) vs WHG (39.86). WHG YTD gains are higher at: 18.670 vs. OWL (-26.097). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. WHG (10.6M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. WHG (33.2M). WHG has less debt than OWL: WHG (10.5M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than WHG: OWL (2.62B) vs WHG (95.7M).
OWLWHGOWL / WHG
Capitalization10.9B157M6,943%
EBITDA804M10.6M7,585%
Gain YTD-26.09718.670-140%
P/E Ratio151.6439.86380%
Revenue2.62B95.7M2,737%
Total Cash118M33.2M355%
Total Debt3.65B10.5M34,743%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHG: Fundamental Ratings
WHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLWHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GURU61.071.05
+1.76%
Global X Guru™ ETF
KRMA44.020.21
+0.49%
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
QUSA19.510.05
+0.26%
Vistashares Target 15 Usa Quality Income ETF
BSCW21.020.04
+0.19%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corp Bd ETF
BGRO38.74N/A
N/A
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+2.27%
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
APO - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
TPG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More

WHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHG has been loosely correlated with ACGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHG jumps, then ACGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHG
1D Price
Change %
WHG100%
+0.06%
ACGP - WHG
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
AMP - WHG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
OWL - WHG
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
BCSF - WHG
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
BEN - WHG
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More