PAG
Price
$157.19
Change
+$1.52 (+0.98%)
Updated
May 1, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.86B
83 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$57.53
Change
-$0.31 (-0.54%)
Updated
May 1, 12:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.12B
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAG vs RUSHB

Header iconPAG vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$157.19
Change+$1.52 (+0.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.86B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.53
Change-$0.31 (-0.54%)
Volume$600
Capitalization4.12B
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHB commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Buy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $155.67 vs. RUSHB: $57.84)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 133% vs. RUSHB: 107%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. RUSHB: $4.12B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. RUSHB’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.23% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($4.12B). RUSHB has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHB (12.65) vs PAG (10.37). RUSHB YTD gains are higher at: 6.582 vs. PAG (2.886). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. RUSHB (737M). RUSHB has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. PAG (96.4M). RUSHB has less debt than PAG: RUSHB (1.81B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHB: PAG (29.5B) vs RUSHB (7.93B).
PAGRUSHBPAG / RUSHB
Capitalization10.9B4.12B265%
EBITDA1.79B737M242%
Gain YTD2.8866.58244%
P/E Ratio10.3712.6582%
Revenue29.5B7.93B372%
Total Cash96.4M184M52%
Total Debt7.74B1.81B428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
4855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (28) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (29) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (6) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (46) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (41) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFDX33.470.03
+0.08%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
WUGI66.54N/A
N/A
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
IUSB46.05-0.06
-0.13%
iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF
BSJU25.32-0.15
-0.59%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 HY Corp Bd ETF
PEY19.83-0.14
-0.70%
Invesco High Yield Eq Div Achiev™ ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-1.22%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
AN - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
-0.84%
RUSHA - RUSHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
AN - RUSHB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ABG - RUSHB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
LAD - RUSHB
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PAG - RUSHB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More