Advertisement
PANW vs S
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Palo Alto Networks (PANW) vs. SentinelOne (S) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is a larger, profitable cybersecurity platform leader, while SentinelOne (S) is a smaller, faster-growing but still unprofitable AI-native endpoint security firm.
- PANW's "platformization" strategy recently drove next-generation security annual recurring revenue (ARR) up roughly 37% and remaining performance obligations (RPO) up about 21%, reflecting strong deal momentum.
- SentinelOne has delivered solid top-line growth but remains GAAP loss-making, which weighs on its relative performance and valuation profile.
- In terms of relative performance, PANW has trended near record territory on an established uptrend, while S has lagged and shown greater volatility over the past year.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: PANW — the AI favors Palo Alto Networks based on trend consistency, profitability, scale, and a steadier catalyst profile.
- For more detail on each company, explore PANW Major News and PANW Today's Price Move, as well as S Major News and S Today's Price Move.
- To see which automated strategies are currently in favor, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Cybersecurity remains one of the most closely watched corners of the technology sector, and PANW and S represent two very different ways to gain exposure to it. Palo Alto Networks is an established, profitable leader spanning network, cloud, and security operations, while SentinelOne is a younger, AI-native challenger focused on endpoint and identity protection. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors weighing the trade-off between scale and profitability versus faster growth at an earlier stage of maturation. By examining recent market positioning, momentum, and financial fundamentals, traders can better assess which profile aligns with their objectives.
PANW Overview and Recent Performance
Palo Alto Networks is a global cybersecurity leader offering AI-powered solutions across network security, cloud security, and security operations. The company has emphasized a "platformization" strategy that consolidates multiple security tools into unified offerings, helping it land larger, multi-year deals. In recent weeks, this strategy has been reflected in healthy growth of next-generation security annual recurring revenue (ARR, a measure of recurring subscription income) and remaining performance obligations (RPO, the total contracted value still to be delivered).
Recent market activity has been constructive for the stock, which completed a 2-for-1 split in late 2024 and has generally traded at historically elevated levels since. Quarterly results showing roughly 14% year-over-year revenue growth and better-than-expected adjusted earnings were accompanied by an initial dip, as some investors weighed premium valuation and moderating guidance. Sentiment nonetheless recovered, supported by a rising backlog and consistent profitability. The company's scale, free cash flow generation, and broadening product suite underpin a relatively stable, established market positioning.
S Overview and Recent Performance
SentinelOne is an AI-powered security provider best known for its Singularity platform, which spans endpoint protection, cloud security, and identity defense. As a younger company, SentinelOne has prioritized top-line expansion and market share over near-term profitability, and it continues to post strong double-digit revenue growth while remaining unprofitable on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis.
In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited choppier behavior than its larger peer, trading well below its 52-week highs and underperforming the broader market over the trailing year. Pricing pressures, rising costs, and questions around the path to sustained profitability have weighed on sentiment, even as the company adds channel partnerships and industry recognition. Upcoming quarterly results remain a key catalyst, with consensus expectations pointing to continued revenue growth. Overall, SentinelOne offers higher growth potential but carries greater execution and valuation uncertainty.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a more systematic approach to this kind of stock comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of securities. Rather than surfacing every available bot, this section highlights only those whose recent performance and configuration are best suited to current market conditions. Reviewing these trending strategies can help investors identify which automated approaches are adapting most effectively to shifting momentum and volatility across names like PANW and S.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The core contrast between these two names is one of maturity. Palo Alto Networks operates at scale, generates consistent profits and free cash flow, and competes across a broad security stack, giving it multiple growth drivers and a steadier margin profile. SentinelOne is earlier in its lifecycle, growing revenue faster in percentage terms but still reporting net losses, which makes its valuation more sensitive to sentiment and execution.
From a market positioning standpoint, PANW benefits from an entrenched enterprise customer base and a proven consolidation strategy, while S competes more directly on innovation and AI-native architecture in a crowded endpoint market. Risk factors also differ: PANW faces concerns around premium valuation and decelerating growth, whereas S faces profitability, pricing pressure, and competitive risks. In terms of recent momentum, PANW's trend has been more consistent and resilient, while S has shown greater drawdowns and more pronounced volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PANW in the current environment. Palo Alto Networks demonstrates stronger trend consistency, a more established uptrend, proven profitability, and a broader catalyst base tied to its platformization momentum. SentinelOne's faster growth is notable, but its unprofitable profile and less stable price action introduce comparatively higher uncertainty. As a result, the AI verdict leans toward PANW as the more dependable choice between the two, though the outcome is expressed in probabilistic terms rather than as a certainty.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a Buy and S is a Hold.
PANW's RSI Oscillator sits in oversold zone for 1 day
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +5.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PANW advanced for three days, in 276 of 356 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
PANW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 202 of 270 cases where PANW Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 75%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PANW as a result. In 56 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PANW turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 67%.
PANW moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PANW crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PANW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PANW’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 100 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.338) is normal, around the industry mean (16.360). PANW has a moderately high P/E Ratio (765.463) as compared to the industry average of (53.310). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.002) is also within normal values, averaging (3.696). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.434) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (25.000) is also within normal values, averaging (104.492).
S in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 16, 2026
S may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 30 of 37 cases where S's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +6.88% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where S advanced for three days, in 225 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 166 of 209 cases where S Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for S moved out of overbought territory on October 12, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 22 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 18 of the 22 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on S as a result. In 77 of 99 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for S turned negative on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
S moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where S declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 19 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.231) is normal, around the industry mean (16.360). P/E Ratio (-21.343) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.310). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.010) is also within normal values, averaging (3.696). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.434) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.067) is also within normal values, averaging (104.492).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. S’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. S’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
PANW | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 81 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (19) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for PANW (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for S (100) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (89) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as S (96) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PANW (49) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (55) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
| PANW | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 78% | 14 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while S’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -14.22% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was -13.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
S is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-2.24% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 85% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| OKTA - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| RBRK - PANW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| S - PANW | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.