PANW
Price
$403.83
Change
-$14.95 (-3.57%)
Updated
Oct 12 closing price
Capitalization
320.73B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZS
Price
$225.78
Change
-$7.95 (-3.40%)
Updated
Oct 12 closing price
Capitalization
32.51B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PANW vs ZS

PANW vs ZS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 06, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Palo Alto Networks (PANW) vs. Zscaler (ZS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • PANW has delivered markedly stronger relative performance, while ZS has lagged despite solid fundamentals.
  • Both companies are riding the same cybersecurity demand tailwind, but Palo Alto Networks is scaling faster through acquisitions and platform consolidation.
  • Zscaler trades at a lower valuation multiple than PANW, reflecting a decelerating growth outlook for fiscal 2027.
  • Palo Alto Networks is a much larger enterprise with broader product reach, while Zscaler remains a focused, cloud-native "zero trust" specialist.
  • Investor sentiment currently skews more favorably toward PANW, though both carry premium technology valuations.

Introduction

Cybersecurity has become one of the market's most watched sectors as enterprises race to defend against artificial intelligence (AI)-driven threats. Within this space, PANW and ZS represent two distinct approaches to the same opportunity. This stock comparison is relevant for growth-oriented investors and traders seeking to understand how market positioning, relative performance, and valuation differentiate two prominent names in the same industry. Palo Alto Networks is a diversified platform vendor spanning network, cloud, and security operations, while Zscaler is a software-as-a-service (SaaS) pioneer built around zero trust architecture. Examining the two side by side clarifies the trade-offs between scale and specialization in today's market environment.

PANW Overview and Recent Performance

Palo Alto Networks is a global cybersecurity leader headquartered in Santa Clara, California, serving a broad enterprise customer base through three platforms: Network & AI Security, Cortex, and Idira (its identity security business, formerly CyberArk). Its "platformization" strategy consolidates many security tools into a unified offering, a thesis that has gained traction as customers seek simpler, AI-ready defenses.

Recent market activity has been notably strong for PANW. The stock has climbed sharply in recent months and is trading near multi-year highs, with substantial year-to-date gains. In its latest reported quarter, revenue rose 34% year over year, and Next-Generation Security annual recurring revenue (ARR) — a key metric measuring recurring subscription income — jumped 63% to $9.1 billion. Acquisitions of Chronosphere and CyberArk have expanded its reach into observability and identity, while newer AI security products have scaled quickly. Sentiment has been supported by record remaining performance obligations and strong free cash flow, though a premium valuation leaves the stock sensitive to any growth disappointment.

ZS Overview and Recent Performance

Zscaler is a cloud-native cybersecurity company based in San Jose, California, widely regarded as a pioneer of the zero trust model, which assumes no user or device is automatically trusted on a network. Its core offerings — Zscaler Internet Access and Zscaler Private Access — securely connect users, workloads, and increasingly AI agents to applications without traditional network hardware.

ZS has shown solid underlying execution in recent quarters, yet its relative performance has trailed its larger peer. In its latest reported quarter, revenue grew about 25% year over year to roughly $898 million, and ARR expanded at a similar pace to approximately $3.8 billion. However, guidance points to a meaningful deceleration, with fiscal 2027 revenue growth projected in the mid-to-high teens. The company recently reaffirmed its outlook at an investor day, emphasizing AI security, data security, and usage-based offerings as growth drivers. While the business remains profitable on a non-GAAP basis and holds a strong cash position, investor sentiment has been tempered by the slower growth trajectory and ongoing sales leadership transitions.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of the platform's AI Trading Bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-driven trading bots covering thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of securities it trades. Only the bots best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section, helping users filter through a large universe to find potentially relevant tools. Whether a bot focuses on short-term momentum, swing trading, or longer-horizon positioning, the diversity of approaches means traders can explore options aligned with their own objectives. To review the current lineup of featured strategies, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between these two names is scale versus focus. Palo Alto Networks is a diversified platform with a market capitalization roughly ten times that of Zscaler, spanning firewalls, cloud security, identity, and observability — much of it built through acquisitions. Zscaler, by contrast, is a pure-play SaaS vendor concentrated in zero trust and secure access, competing primarily on architectural simplicity rather than breadth.

Growth trajectories are also diverging. PANW is sustaining strong revenue and ARR growth partly through inorganic expansion, while ZS is guiding toward a slower organic growth rate as it transitions its sales model and integrates newer products. On valuation, Zscaler trades at a lower price-to-sales and forward earnings multiple, reflecting that reduced growth visibility, whereas PANW commands a premium that embeds higher expectations.

Risk profiles differ as well. Palo Alto Networks carries acquisition-integration risk and margin pressure from a shift toward cloud-based offerings. Zscaler faces execution risk around sales leadership changes, elevated competition, and stock-based compensation. Both are exposed to competition from large cloud providers and potential slowdowns in security spending.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PANW in the current environment. Its trend consistency, stronger relative momentum, broader platform adoption, and multiple growth catalysts — including scaling AI security offerings and newly integrated acquisitions — provide a steadier backdrop than Zscaler's slower-growth outlook and ongoing sales reorganization. The AI framework would weigh Palo Alto Networks' more robust trend signals and larger, more diversified revenue base as advantages in relative positioning. That said, this assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive; Zscaler's lower valuation and specialized zero trust franchise could become more attractive if its growth re-accelerates. No outcome is guaranteed, and relative leadership can shift quickly as new data emerges.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PANW vs. ZS commentary
Oct 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a StrongBuy and ZS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANW vs ZS: Fundamental Ratings
PANW
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3043
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
8992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZS's Valuation (63) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (99) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (89) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZS (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZS (35) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PANWZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2026
Stock price -- (PANW: $403.83 vs. ZS: $225.78)
Brand notoriety: PANW and ZS are both notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PANW: 79% vs. ZS: 76%
Market capitalization -- PANW: $320.73B vs. ZS: $32.51B
PANW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $320.73B. ZS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $32.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $48.8K to $3.78T. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $35.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PANW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while ZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than ZS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PANW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PANW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the short-term than ZS.

Price Growth

PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was +11.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

ZS is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-2.28% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
PANW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWS32.380.37
+1.16%
News Corp
CCSI36.960.25
+0.68%
Consensus Cloud Solutions
GPI229.64-2.37
-1.02%
Group 1 Automotive
JYNT6.94-0.10
-1.42%
Joint Corp (The)
YHGJ2.67-0.07
-2.55%
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd.

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
-3.57%
CRWD - PANW
85%
Closely correlated
-4.37%
FTNT - PANW
76%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
OKTA - PANW
70%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
TENB - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
RBRK - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.10%
More

ZS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZS
1D Price
Change %
ZS100%
-3.40%
CRWD - ZS
68%
Closely correlated
-4.37%
COIN - ZS
66%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
OKTA - ZS
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
CLSK - ZS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
PANW - ZS
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
More