PASTF
Price
$9.50
Change
+$0.50 (+5.56%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
PHIN
Price
$58.60
Change
+$0.07 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PASTF vs PHIN

Header iconPASTF vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts PASTF vs PHINBanner chart's image
OPmobility
Price$9.50
Change+$0.50 (+5.56%)
Volume$2.33K
Capitalization2.16B
PHINIA
Price$58.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
Volume$284.28K
Capitalization2.28B
PASTF vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PASTF vs. PHIN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PASTF is a Hold and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PASTF: $9.50 vs. PHIN: $58.60)
Brand notoriety: PASTF and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PASTF: 100% vs. PHIN: 67%
Market capitalization -- PASTF: $2.16B vs. PHIN: $2.28B
PASTF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.16B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PASTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PASTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than PASTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

PASTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.28B) has a higher market cap than PASTF($2.16B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than PASTF: PHIN (22.63) vs PASTF (8.06). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 23.681 vs. PASTF (0.000). PASTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. PHIN (452M). PHIN has less debt than PASTF: PHIN (1.04B) vs PASTF (2.29B). PASTF has higher revenues than PHIN: PASTF (10.4B) vs PHIN (3.36B).
PASTFPHINPASTF / PHIN
Capitalization2.16B2.28B95%
EBITDA767M452M170%
Gain YTD0.00023.681-
P/E Ratio8.0622.6336%
Revenue10.4B3.36B310%
Total Cash706MN/A-
Total Debt2.29B1.04B219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PASTF: Fundamental Ratings
PASTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PASTFPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRIRX75.90N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
CGOAX29.00N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth A
CVLCX11.10N/A
N/A
Calamos Global Opportunities C
WFEMX18.15N/A
N/A
WCM Focused Emerging Markets Investor
AHSZX20.11N/A
N/A
Alger Health Sciences Z

PASTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PASTF and CTTAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PASTF and CTTAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PASTF
1D Price
Change %
PASTF100%
N/A
CTTAY - PASTF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
KNRRY - PASTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
PHIN - PASTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
HSAI - PASTF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
FYGGY - PASTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.12%
BWA - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
VC - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
AXL - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
ATMU - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
ALV - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More