PASTF
Price
$9.50
Change
+$0.50 (+5.56%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
PHIN
Price
$58.13
Change
+$0.48 (+0.83%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.24B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PASTF vs PHIN

Header iconPASTF vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts PASTF vs PHINBanner chart's image
OPmobility
Price$9.50
Change+$0.50 (+5.56%)
Volume$2.33K
Capitalization2.29B
PHINIA
Price$58.13
Change+$0.48 (+0.83%)
Volume$1.81K
Capitalization2.24B
PASTF vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PASTF vs. PHIN commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PASTF is a Hold and PHIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PASTF: $9.50 vs. PHIN: $57.65)
Brand notoriety: PASTF and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PASTF: 100% vs. PHIN: 73%
Market capitalization -- PASTF: $2.29B vs. PHIN: $2.24B
PASTF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.29B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PASTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PASTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than PASTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PASTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.59% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASTF($2.29B) and PHIN($2.24B) have the same market capitalization . PHIN has higher P/E ratio than PASTF: PHIN (22.26) vs PASTF (8.06). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 21.676 vs. PASTF (0.000). PASTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. PHIN (452M). PASTF has more cash in the bank: 706M vs. PHIN (347M). PHIN has less debt than PASTF: PHIN (1.04B) vs PASTF (2.29B). PASTF has higher revenues than PHIN: PASTF (10.4B) vs PHIN (3.36B).
PASTFPHINPASTF / PHIN
Capitalization2.29B2.24B102%
EBITDA767M452M170%
Gain YTD0.00021.676-
P/E Ratio8.0622.2636%
Revenue10.4B3.36B310%
Total Cash706M347M203%
Total Debt2.29B1.04B219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PASTF: Fundamental Ratings
PASTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PASTFPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGOVX30.83N/A
N/A
First Eagle Overseas A
PGPCX27.76N/A
N/A
George Putnam Balanced C
HLFNX35.55N/A
N/A
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Investor
JHARX10.34N/A
N/A
JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return R2
BFTUX67.26-0.65
-0.96%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6

PASTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PASTF and CTTAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PASTF and CTTAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PASTF
1D Price
Change %
PASTF100%
N/A
CTTAY - PASTF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
KNRRY - PASTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
PHIN - PASTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HSAI - PASTF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FYGGY - PASTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More