PBW
Price
$39.91
Change
-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
579.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XT
Price
$80.88
Change
-$0.54 (-0.66%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBW vs XT

Header iconPBW vs XT Comparison
Open Charts PBW vs XTBanner chart's image
PBW vs XT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) vs. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT)

Key Takeaways

  • PBW provides targeted exposure to U.S.-listed clean energy companies through a passive strategy tracking the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, while XT offers broader global access to companies developing or utilizing exponential technologies across multiple sectors.
  • PBW holds approximately 68-70 securities with a modified equal-weighted approach, resulting in higher concentration in smaller clean-energy firms, whereas XT maintains around 200 holdings in a market-cap-weighted structure for greater diversification.
  • PBW carries a higher expense ratio of 0.64% compared to XT's 0.46%, reflecting its specialized thematic focus versus XT's more scalable global technology mandate.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: PBW concentrates on renewables and energy conservation, while XT emphasizes technology (approximately 48%) and healthcare (approximately 22%), with additional exposure to industrials and consumer cyclicals.
  • PBW exhibits greater volatility tied to clean-energy policy and commodity cycles, whereas XT demonstrates relatively more stable positioning through its diversified exponential-technology theme amid innovation-driven market cycles.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing with periodic rebalancing, but XT's larger asset base and lower costs position it for broader institutional appeal in long-term thematic portfolios.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic growth often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target innovation and sustainability. The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and the iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) represent distinct approaches within growth-oriented strategies. PBW focuses narrowly on clean energy advancement, while XT captures a wider array of exponential technologies. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative options for investors pursuing exposure to transformative sectors, allowing differentiation based on risk tolerance, cost preferences, and thematic conviction.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the WilderHill Clean Energy Index. The index selects U.S.-listed companies involved in cleaner energy production, conservation, or technologies expected to benefit from the shift toward zero-carbon renewables. The fund typically invests at least 90% of its assets in index components and maintains roughly 68-70 holdings. Top holdings often include smaller-capitalization names such as HYLN, NVTS, and FCEL, reflecting a modified equal-weighted methodology that limits dominance by any single issuer. Sector exposure centers on clean energy sub-industries including solar, wind, fuel cells, and energy storage. PBW features an expense ratio of 0.64% and employs quarterly rebalancing to align with the index. Its structure emphasizes thematic purity over broad market representation, resulting in elevated volatility relative to diversified equity benchmarks.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) Overview

The iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index. This index comprises developed- and emerging-market companies that create or employ exponential technologies capable of displacing legacy models and generating new markets. The fund generally allocates at least 80% of assets to index constituents and holds approximately 199-229 securities. Top holdings typically feature larger technology and healthcare leaders such as NVDA, Texas Instruments, Tesla, Eli Lilly, and Microsoft. Sector allocations include technology at roughly 48%, healthcare near 22%, industrials around 9%, and consumer cyclicals approximately 8%. XT maintains an expense ratio of 0.46% and follows market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing. Its global scope and diversified holdings distinguish it as a broader vehicle for innovation exposure compared to narrower thematic peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader innovation and sustainability themes shaping capital markets. Clean energy faces catalysts including policy support for decarbonization, technological advances in storage and renewables, and corporate sustainability commitments, alongside risks from interest-rate sensitivity, supply-chain constraints, and regulatory shifts. Exponential technologies benefit from rapid advances in artificial intelligence, biotechnology, automation, and semiconductors, supported by sustained research-and-development spending and digital transformation across industries. Macroeconomic drivers such as inflation trends, geopolitical tensions affecting energy and chip supply, and evolving capital flows into growth sectors influence both themes. Regulatory developments around emissions standards and technology export controls add layers of complexity, while sector rotation between value and growth styles affects relative demand for these specialized exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, PBW has shown heightened sensitivity to clean-energy policy announcements and commodity price movements, leading to more pronounced swings during periods of shifting investor sentiment toward renewables. XT has generally displayed more consistent participation in technology-led rallies, benefiting from momentum in artificial intelligence and semiconductor demand while its healthcare component provides partial ballast. Relative positioning highlights PBW's concentrated bet on energy transition outcomes versus XT's multi-sector approach to disruptive innovation. Volatility differences arise from PBW's smaller-cap tilt and narrower focus, contrasted with XT's larger, more liquid holdings and geographic diversification. Over broader timeframes, performance divergences often trace to sector rotation favoring either traditional growth equities or specialized sustainability plays, depending on prevailing macroeconomic conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights tailored to individual strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to XT. The ETF’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 200 global holdings, and exposure to multiple high-momentum exponential technologies provide a more balanced risk-return profile compared to PBW’s narrower clean-energy concentration and elevated costs. XT’s positioning aligns with sustained innovation cycles and offers greater resilience across varying macroeconomic environments, though both funds carry thematic risks that warrant careful consideration within a diversified portfolio.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PBW vs. XT commentary
Jun 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBW is a Hold and XT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XT has more net assets: 3.95B vs. PBW (580M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than XT: PBW (31.173) vs XT (17.269). PBW was incepted earlier than XT: PBW (21 years) vs XT (11 years). XT (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than PBW (0.64). PBW has a higher turnover XT (43.00) vs XT (43.00).
PBWXTPBW / XT
Gain YTD31.17317.269181%
Net Assets580M3.95B15%
Total Expense Ratio0.640.46139%
Turnover62.0043.00144%
Yield0.600.7976%
Fund Existence21 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBWXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PKW140.420.60
+0.43%
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
JMID31.67N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
CBXY21.98-0.03
-0.14%
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-July
BDGS36.56-0.19
-0.51%
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
HEEM44.36-0.89
-1.97%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Em Mkts ETF

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-2.01%
ENVX - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
-6.36%
BLDP - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
QS - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
ACHR - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.87%
More