Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCEMX vs RNWFX
PCEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PCEMX vs RNWFX
PCEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. PCEMX (573M). PCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: PCEMX (1.56) vs RNWFX (1.19). PCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PCEMX (31 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). PCEMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCEMX: RNWFX (250) vs PCEMX (10000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.62 vs. RNWFX (19.68). PCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.68 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| PCEMX | RNWFX | PCEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.62 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.697 | 12.700 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.62 | 19.68 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.85 | 44.28 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.68 | 14.77 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.22 | 110.07 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement