Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets756.84M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.73
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. PCPAX (757M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.16). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. PCPAX (6.94). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 63.07 vs. PCPAX (39.63).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.424 | 7.553 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 9.78 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.94 | 27.29 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.63 | 63.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.37 | 74.66 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement