Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.39
Change+$0.29 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.42M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.00
Change+$0.23 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.88B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PCPAX (753M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.37) vs RMEBX (1.12). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. PCPAX (4.72). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.66 vs. PCPAX (31.14).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.867 | 9.458 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.12 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 9.38 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.28 | 28.34 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | 54.66 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.59 | 79.18 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement