Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$23.43
Change+$0.27 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.03M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.09B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PCPAX (766M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.32) vs RMEBX (1.05). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. PCPAX (3.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.90 vs. PCPAX (33.20).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.089 | 14.463 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.05 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 5.39 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 38.85 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.20 | 59.90 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.49 | 87.01 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement