Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$21.73
Change+$0.24 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.8M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PCPAX (745M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.16). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. PCPAX (4.01). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. PCPAX (22.47).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.862 | 5.842 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 745M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 8.87 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | 17.32 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.47 | 50.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.51 | 68.95 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement