Ad is loading...
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$20.50
Change+$0.28 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.86M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.03
Change+$0.72 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. PCPAX (713M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.43) vs RMEBX (1.18). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. PCPAX (-0.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.15 vs. PCPAX (35.03).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.394 | -1.317 | 30% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.18 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.81 | 3.70 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.62 | 9.15 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.03 | 53.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.17 | 54.60 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...