Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PCPAX (766M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.37) vs RMEBX (1.11). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. PCPAX (7.01). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. PCPAX (30.34).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.823 | 10.612 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.11 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 7.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.68 | 22.19 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 53.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.94 | 77.43 | 13% |