Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFGRX vs RGABX
PFGRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PFGRX vs RGABX
PFGRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFGRX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGRX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PFGRX (6.33B). PFGRX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . PFGRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PFGRX (14 years) vs RGABX (24 years). PFGRX (1.41) and RGABX (1.38) have similar cost to investors . RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PFGRX (26.00). PFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: PFGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. PFGRX (-8.74). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.85 vs. PFGRX (-7.88).
| PFGRX | RGABX | PFGRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.38 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.38 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.653 | 6.715 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 2.20 | -397% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.90 | 32.48 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.88 | 7.85 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.04 | 83.21 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement