Advertisement
PHIN vs SURE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHIN is a Hold and SURE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PHIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PHIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.49% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.98%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.97% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| PHIN | SURE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 53% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
PHIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHIN | 100% | +3.69% | ||
| ALV - PHIN | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.34% | ||
| VC - PHIN | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.37% | ||
| BWA - PHIN | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.88% | ||
| APTV - PHIN | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.48% | ||
| ALSN - PHIN | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
SURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURE has been loosely correlated with TTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURE jumps, then TTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SURE | 100% | N/A | ||
| TTC - SURE | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| WH - SURE | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| SLB - SURE | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| MORN - SURE | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| PHIN - SURE | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.69% | ||
More | ||||