PINS vs SMWB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINS is a Hold and SMWB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMWB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SMWB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMWB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SMWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +7.98% price change this week, while SMWB (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +10.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
SMWB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+10.91% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Packaged Software (+3.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| PINS | SMWB | PINS / SMWB | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 708M | 3,390% |
| EBITDA | -104.17M | -18.55M | 562% |
| Gain YTD | -5.724 | -47.424 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 312.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.06B | 218M | 1,401% |
| Total Cash | 2.51B | 71.7M | 3,502% |
| Total Debt | 196M | 67.4M | 291% |
PINS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PINS | SMWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| META - PINS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| SNAP - PINS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| GOOG - PINS | 40% Loosely correlated | -7.51% | ||
More | ||||
SMWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMWB has been loosely correlated with BL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMWB jumps, then BL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMWB | 100% | N/A | ||
| BL - SMWB | 59% Loosely correlated | +8.62% | ||
| TDC - SMWB | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| TWLO - SMWB | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| DASH - SMWB | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| TBLA - SMWB | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||