Advertisement
PINS vs THRY
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs. Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Thryv Holdings (THRY) has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 36% compared to Pinterest's (PINS) 22%, outperforming the S&P 500 in recent market activity.
- THRY trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of around 12 versus PINS's 33, suggesting relative value amid its small-cap status.
- Recent earnings for THRY showed SaaS revenue growth and beats on EPS and revenue, while PINS approaches its quarterly report with projected moderate growth.
- PINS boasts a larger market capitalization of over $12 billion, offering greater stability than THRY's $171 million.
- Both stocks exhibit low betas under 1, indicating lower volatility relative to the broader market.
Introduction
Pinterest (PINS) and Thryv Holdings (THRY) represent distinct approaches within the digital services landscape: PINS focuses on visual discovery and advertising, while THRY targets software solutions for small businesses. This comparison is relevant for traders monitoring tech momentum and value plays, as well as investors evaluating growth in advertising and SaaS transitions amid shifting market sentiment. Recent performance highlights contrasts in scale, valuation, and catalysts, aiding decisions on relative positioning in portfolios.
PINS Overview and Recent Performance
Pinterest (PINS) operates a visual discovery platform connecting users to ideas and products through advertising revenue. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $20, reflecting year-to-date gains of about 22% but lagging its 52-week high near $40. Sentiment has been influenced by solid Q4 2025 results with revenue up 14% and record users, though post-earnings reactions pressured shares earlier in the year due to growth outlook concerns. Analysts maintain a Buy consensus with targets around $23, ahead of Q1 2026 earnings expected May 4, projecting EPS of $0.22 and revenue near $964 million. Trading volume remains robust, with a beta of 0.88 signaling moderate market sensitivity.
THRY Overview and Recent Performance
Thryv Holdings (THRY) provides a SaaS (software-as-a-service) platform for small and medium-sized businesses, emphasizing marketing tools and customer management. Shares recently hovered near $3.90, with year-to-date returns of roughly 36% despite high volatility from a 52-week range of $1.91 to $15.49. Key drivers include Q1 2026 results showing SaaS revenue growth of 5% to $117 million (70% of total), EPS beat at $0.10, and improved adjusted EBITDA, offsetting declines in legacy services. ARPU (average revenue per user) rose 13%, boosting sentiment. Analyst targets average $4.67 with Buy ratings, though its small market cap amplifies risk, reflected in a beta of 0.77.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each employing diverse strategies like trend trading, swing trading, and multi-agent systems across timeframes from 5 minutes to 50 days. These bots trade thousands of tickers in high-growth areas such as semiconductors and small caps, posting impressive stats: annualized returns ranging from +24% to +164% (average around 65%), win rates of 51% to 88% (average 60%), and profit factors up to 11.7. None currently feature PINS or THRY, but their real-time signals highlight market leaders amid volatility. Explore these bots to align with current conditions and potentially enhance trading strategies.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PINS and THRY diverge sharply in business models: PINS leverages consumer-facing visual ads with AI enhancements, while THRY focuses on B2B SaaS for SMB marketing amid a shift from print services. Growth drivers contrast with PINS' user expansion and CTV potential versus THRY's SaaS mix rising to 70%. Recent momentum favors THRY (1-year +69% vs. +21%), but PINS offers scale. Risk factors include THRY's volatility and dilution concerns against PINS' competition in social ads. Sector exposure ties both to digital marketing, with sentiment buoyed by earnings catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward THRY based on superior recent momentum, earnings beats, and attractive valuation metrics like lower P/E amid SaaS progress. While PINS shows stability and upcoming catalysts, THRY's relative outperformance suggests higher probability of near-term upside in volatile conditions, though small-cap risks warrant caution.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINS is a Buy and THRY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHRY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- THRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THRY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- THRY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -5.65% price change this week, while THRY (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
THRY is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+0.97% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| PINS | THRY | PINS / THRY | |
| Capitalization | 11.3B | 171M | 6,608% |
| EBITDA | 350M | 97.5M | 359% |
| Gain YTD | -21.939 | -36.198 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.10 | 11.70 | 360% |
| Revenue | 4.37B | 771M | 567% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 7.95M | 16,336% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 259M | 465% |
PINS | THRY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
THRY's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PINS (67) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
THRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PINS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's SMR Rating (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as THRY (81) in the null industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to THRY’s over the last 12 months.
THRY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PINS (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for THRY (76) in the null industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew significantly faster than THRY’s over the last 12 months.
| PINS | THRY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBVTX | 81.77 | 1.02 | +1.26% |
| Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R3 | |||
| FSLSX | 67.67 | 0.81 | +1.21% |
| Fidelity Value Strategies | |||
| SUVZX | 14.41 | 0.13 | +0.91% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z | |||
| LGOSX | 30.77 | 0.15 | +0.49% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R4 | |||
| SHXIX | 15.78 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps R5 | |||
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | -6.00% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| THRY - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| DASH - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| Z - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||
THRY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THRY has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THRY jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THRY | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| META - THRY | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| OPRA - THRY | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| PINS - THRY | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.00% | ||
| ZM - THRY | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CARG - THRY | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||