Advertisement
PINS vs SNAP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pinterest (PINS) vs. Snap (SNAP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both PINS and SNAP have delivered similar year-to-date gains of approximately 22%, reflecting resilience in the social media advertising sector.
- PINS stands out with positive earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share) of $0.61 trailing twelve months (TTM), while SNAP remains unprofitable at -$0.27 EPS TTM.
- SNAP has shown stronger recent momentum with over 30% gains in the past month, outpacing PINS's roughly 8% rise.
- PINS trades at a market cap of $12.8 billion with a price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 32.87, compared to SNAP's $10.6 billion cap and no PE due to losses.
- Activist investor Elliott Management's stake in PINS earlier this year boosted sentiment, while SNAP benefits from AI-driven product enhancements.
Introduction
Both PINS (Pinterest, Inc.) and SNAP (Snap Inc.) operate in the competitive visual social media space, relying heavily on advertising revenue from engaged user bases. Pinterest focuses on visual discovery and inspiration, while Snapchat emphasizes ephemeral messaging and augmented reality (AR). Investors and traders comparing these stocks assess relative performance amid macroeconomic pressures on ad spending, evolving user trends, and tech sector volatility. This analysis highlights recent market positioning, growth trajectories, and key metrics to inform decisions on potential relative outperformance in the current environment.
PINS Overview and Recent Performance
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) runs a visual discovery platform with over 500 million monthly active users, driving revenue through targeted ads in lifestyle and shopping categories. In recent market activity, shares have climbed about 8% over the past month, supporting a year-to-date advance of 22%, though trailing one-year returns have been mixed around 21%. Trading near $20, the stock reflects a 52-week range of $13.84 to $39.93, with a market cap of $12.8 billion. Sentiment has been influenced by solid Q4 2025 results showing $1.32 billion in revenue and positive net income, tempered by cautious Q1 2026 guidance amid ad pricing pressures. Investments in AI shopping features and connected TV (CTV) ads, alongside activist Elliott Management's stake, have supported stability, with a beta of 0.88 indicating lower volatility.
SNAP Overview and Recent Performance
Snap Inc. (SNAP) powers Snapchat, a platform known for short-lived photo and video sharing with AR lenses, boasting robust daily active users. Recent weeks have seen shares surge over 30% in the past month and up 22% year-to-date, rebounding from lows with one-year gains near 20%. At around $6.27, it spans a 52-week range of $3.81 to $10.41, with a $10.6 billion market cap. Performance reflects AI integrations writing much of the codebase and upcoming earnings expectations, despite ongoing losses. Challenges include U.S. user growth slowdowns, but momentum from premium features like Snapchat+ and analyst upgrades has lifted sentiment, with a beta of 0.91.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots from a library of 351, curated for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, and corridor exits, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 50 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 164%, win rates ranging 51% to 88%, and profit factors from 1.48 to 11.70. They target hot sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AVGO), data centers, and space stocks, offering real-time signals and risk controls like profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 16. Explore these high-conviction options to potentially enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PINS emphasizes visual search and e-commerce integration, yielding higher revenue per user and profitability, with TTM revenue of $4.22 billion versus SNAP’s $5.93 billion but persistent losses. Growth drivers differ: Pinterest leverages AI for shopping recommendations, while Snap pushes AR and subscriptions. Recent momentum favors SNAP amid its surge, but PINS offers trend consistency. Risks include ad market competition from Meta and TikTok for both, with SNAP facing higher user monetization hurdles and PINS guidance concerns. Sector exposure ties them to digital ads, where sentiment tilts toward profitable models like Pinterest’s.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PINS over SNAP, citing superior profitability, lower valuation risks via a defined PE ratio, and activist-driven catalysts for sustained trends. While SNAP’s momentum is compelling, PINS’ stability and positive EPS position it better for relative outperformance amid ad sector uncertainties.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINS is a Buy and SNAP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SNAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while SNAP (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -12.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -3.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
SNAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-3.06% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| PINS | SNAP | PINS / SNAP | |
| Capitalization | 12B | 8.83B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 350M | -99.77M | -351% |
| Gain YTD | -16.956 | -33.953 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.37B | 6.1B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 2.82B | 46% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 4.2B | 29% |
PINS | SNAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINS's Valuation (67) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SNAP (99). This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SNAP (100). This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's SMR Rating (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SNAP (97). This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SNAP (61). This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNAP (100). This means that PINS’s stock grew significantly faster than SNAP’s over the last 12 months.
| PINS | SNAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
Advertisement
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | -1.24% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| THRY - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| DASH - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.19% | ||
| ANGI - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
More | ||||
SNAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNAP has been loosely correlated with PPLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNAP jumps, then PPLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNAP | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| PPLI - SNAP | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| RUM - SNAP | 38% Loosely correlated | +7.79% | ||
| PINS - SNAP | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| CARG - SNAP | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| ZIP - SNAP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||