Advertisement
PLAG vs RMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLAG is a StrongBuy and RMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PLAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLAG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PLAG (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +20.26% price change this week, while RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+2.69% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.52% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| PLAG | RMCF | PLAG / RMCF | |
| Capitalization | 12.7M | 11.8M | 108% |
| EBITDA | -6.5M | -3.12M | 208% |
| Gain YTD | -32.563 | -37.449 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.07M | 29.5M | 21% |
| Total Cash | 1.15M | 893K | 128% |
| Total Debt | 3.17M | 7.1M | 45% |
PLAG | RMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLAG's Valuation (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (78). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (100). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's SMR Rating (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (98). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (62). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLAG (100). This means that RMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
| PLAG | RMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 22 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
PLAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLAG and RMCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLAG and RMCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | 100% | N/A | ||
| RMCF - PLAG | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| NNBR - PLAG | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| NOMD - PLAG | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.94% | ||
| FIP - PLAG | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| KHC - PLAG | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
RMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMCF | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| DTEAF - RMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INGR - RMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| PLAG - RMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.14% | ||
| CAG - RMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| THS - RMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
More | ||||