PLMNF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
6.86M
PMCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLMNF vs PMCCF

Header iconPLMNF vs PMCCF Comparison
Open Charts PLMNF vs PMCCFBanner chart's image
Palamina
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.1K
Capitalization6.86M
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization9.11M
PLMNF vs PMCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLMNF vs. PMCCF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMNF is a Hold and PMCCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PLMNF: $0.08 vs. PMCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PLMNF and PMCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLMNF: 223% vs. PMCCF: 66%
Market capitalization -- PLMNF: $6.86M vs. PMCCF: $9.11M
PLMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.86M. PMCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLMNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PLMNF and PMCCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLMNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCCF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLMNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the short-term than PLMNF.

Price Growth

PLMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCCF($9.11M) has a higher market cap than PLMNF($6.86M). PMCCF YTD gains are higher at: 28.696 vs. PLMNF (5.630). PMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -558.87K vs. PLMNF (-1.62M). PLMNF has more cash in the bank: 384K vs. PMCCF (51.2K). PLMNF (0) and PMCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PLMNFPMCCFPLMNF / PMCCF
Capitalization6.86M9.11M75%
EBITDA-1.62M-558.87K291%
Gain YTD5.63028.69620%
P/E RatioN/A18.76-
Revenue00-
Total Cash384K51.2K750%
Total DebtN/A100K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLMNF vs PMCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PLMNF
PMCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3139
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLMNF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (86). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (100). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLMNF (100). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (50). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (66). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLMNFPMCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PERF2.530.13
+5.42%
Perfect Corp
GRCE3.130.11
+3.64%
Grace Therapeutics Inc
NOW1044.6934.93
+3.46%
SERVICENOW
NTST17.070.23
+1.37%
NetSTREIT Corp
KBR47.620.17
+0.36%
KBR

PLMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLMNF and EOGSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLMNF and EOGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMNF
1D Price
Change %
PLMNF100%
N/A
EOGSF - PLMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PLMNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
PGOL - PLMNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+21.95%
PEXZF - PLMNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
PMCCF - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
N/A
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXNRF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.54%
PPTA - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
GROY - PMCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
SSRM - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More