PNFP
Price
$111.68
Change
-$2.58 (-2.26%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
48 days until earnings call
UBSI
Price
$36.07
Change
-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.74B
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PNFP vs UBSI

Header iconPNFP vs UBSI Comparison
Open Charts PNFP vs UBSIBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$111.68
Change-$2.58 (-2.26%)
Volume$355.1K
Capitalization6.62B
United Bankshares
Price$36.07
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Volume$799.66K
Capitalization4.74B
PNFP vs UBSI Comparison Chart
Loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. UBSI commentary
Mar 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a Buy and UBSI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PNFP: $111.70 vs. UBSI: $36.07)
Brand notoriety: PNFP and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 78% vs. UBSI: 122%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $6.62B vs. UBSI: $4.74B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.62B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than UBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the short-term than PNFP.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.76% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than UBSI($4.74B). UBSI has higher P/E ratio than PNFP: UBSI (12.97) vs PNFP (11.70). PNFP YTD gains are higher at: -2.165 vs. UBSI (-3.941). UBSI has more cash in the bank: 270M vs. PNFP (229M). UBSI has less debt than PNFP: UBSI (1.88B) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than UBSI: PNFP (1.38B) vs UBSI (1.05B).
PNFPUBSIPNFP / UBSI
Capitalization6.62B4.74B140%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.165-3.94155%
P/E Ratio11.7012.9790%
Revenue1.38B1.05B132%
Total Cash229M270M85%
Total Debt2.56B1.88B136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3655
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBSI's Valuation (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (90). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (55). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (11). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (61). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSI (46). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBLL105.560.02
+0.02%
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
XDAT25.37N/A
N/A
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
XMAR36.64-0.13
-0.36%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
GAA28.95-0.11
-0.39%
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
CSM66.00-1.22
-1.81%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
-2.24%
SSB - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
-1.57%
UBSI - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
ABCB - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
SNV - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
UCB - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
More

UBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBSI has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBSI jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSI
1D Price
Change %
UBSI100%
-0.19%
FFBC - UBSI
92%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
UCB - UBSI
91%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
AUB - UBSI
91%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
SFNC - UBSI
91%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
HOMB - UBSI
91%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
More