Advertisement
PNTG vs UHS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Pennant Group (PNTG) vs. Universal Health Services (UHS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- The Pennant Group (PNTG) specializes in home health, hospice, and senior living services, while Universal Health Services (UHS) focuses on acute care hospitals and behavioral health facilities, both within the healthcare sector.
- UHS has a significantly larger market capitalization ($10.7 billion vs. PNTG's $1.05 billion) and lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio (7.6 vs. 35.9), indicating potentially better value.
- PNTG delivered a stronger one-year return of about 19%, outperforming UHS's 1%, though both have experienced recent volatility.
- UHS leads year-to-date with 19% gains compared to PNTG's 7%, amid anticipation for its upcoming quarterly earnings.
- Both stocks trade with similar betas around 1.3, reflecting comparable market sensitivity, but UHS offers greater scale and earnings stability.
Introduction
This comparison examines PNTG and UHS, two players in the healthcare facilities industry. PNTG emphasizes home-based and senior care services, while UHS operates hospitals and behavioral health centers. Investors tracking healthcare sector trends, particularly those balancing growth potential against value metrics, may find value here. Recent market activity highlights shifts in sentiment driven by earnings outlooks and operational updates, aiding traders in assessing relative performance and positioning in a dynamic environment.
PNTG Overview and Recent Performance
The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG) delivers healthcare services through its Home Health and Hospice Services segment alongside Senior Living operations across the U.S. With a market cap of approximately $1.05 billion, the stock trades around $30 per share, within a 52-week range of $21.73 to $35. In recent weeks, PNTG has faced downward pressure, declining about 7% over the past month amid broader sector challenges, though it maintains a one-year gain of 17-19%. Sentiment has been influenced by solid Q4 revenue of $289 million exceeding estimates, boosting longer-term confidence despite elevated P/E ratio of 35.9 and earnings per share (EPS) of $0.84 trailing twelve months (TTM). Analysts project moderate upside, reflecting growth in home health demand.
UHS Overview and Recent Performance
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) owns and operates acute care hospitals, outpatient centers, and behavioral health facilities. Its $10.7 billion market cap underscores its scale, with shares near $175-$181 in a 52-week range of $152 to $246. Recent market activity shows mixed momentum, with year-to-date gains of 19% but a one-year return of just 1%, pressured by prior earnings misses and operational hurdles like facility challenges. Trading volume remains robust, and anticipation for Q1 earnings on April 27 builds optimism, with projected EPS of $5.36. Key metrics include a low P/E of 7.6 and TTM EPS of $23.10, signaling undervaluation relative to peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available on the platform, which trade thousands of tickers including stocks and ETFs. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical analysis (TA), fundamental analysis (FA), or AI/ML models—across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, with varying risk profiles like short-term scalping or trend-following. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 178%, win rates reaching 88%, profit factors as high as 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 21 in top performers, though drawdowns can hit $48,000 in aggressive setups. Ideal for current volatile markets, they help traders automate decisions on assets like semiconductors or volatility plays. Explore these bots to enhance your strategy across tickers like PNTG and UHS.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PNTG and UHS share healthcare exposure but diverge in models: PNTG leverages home health growth amid aging demographics, while UHS benefits from hospital volumes and behavioral health demand. Growth drivers favor PNTG's niche expansion versus UHS's scale efficiencies. Recent momentum tilts to UHS YTD, but PNTG shows better annual gains; both exhibit volatility with betas near 1.3. Risks include regulatory pressures and labor costs, heightened for UHS due to facility issues. Market sentiment leans positive for UHS pre-earnings, contrasting PNTG's post-Q4 consolidation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors UHS over PNTG, citing its superior valuation (P/E of 7.6), larger operational scale, and near-term earnings catalyst as factors enhancing trend consistency and relative positioning. While PNTG offers growth in home care, UHS presents a higher probability of stability and upside in the prevailing healthcare landscape.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNTG is a Buy and UHS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PNTG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PNTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PNTG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PNTG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UHS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PNTG (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.57% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
PNTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.10% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| PNTG | UHS | PNTG / UHS | |
| Capitalization | 1.17B | 8.64B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 66.1M | 2.8B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 19.218 | -34.421 | -56% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.02 | 5.96 | 655% |
| Revenue | 1.02B | 17.8B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 4.91M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 453M | 5.13B | 9% |
PNTG | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (11) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNTG (76) in the null industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNTG’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as UHS (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's SMR Rating (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as PNTG (75) in the null industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to PNTG’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as UHS (65) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (87) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
| PNTG | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
PNTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNTG has been loosely correlated with AVAH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNTG jumps, then AVAH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNTG | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| AVAH - PNTG | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| CON - PNTG | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| UHS - PNTG | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ENSG - PNTG | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| NHC - PNTG | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
UHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been loosely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| HCA - UHS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| THC - UHS | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| PNTG - UHS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| ENSG - UHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| CON - UHS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||