Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PONAX vs WFCPX
PONAX vs WFCPX Comparison
Open Charts PONAX vs WFCPX
Allspring Managed Acct CoreBuilder® CP
Price$17.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets899.82M
PONAX vs WFCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 190B vs. WFCPX (900M). PONAX pays higher dividends than WFCPX: PONAX (5.75) vs WFCPX (4.92). PONAX was incepted earlier than WFCPX: PONAX (18 years) vs WFCPX (4 years). PONAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than WFCPX (0.15). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. WFCPX (291.00). WFCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: WFCPX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. WFCPX (4.74).
| PONAX | WFCPX | PONAX / WFCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.15 | 820% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.192 | 4.795 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190B | 900M | 21,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 4.92 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 4.74 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.66 | 12.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.14 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EET | 68.01 | 0.22 | +0.32% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
| BCLO | 49.90 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | |||
| GVI | 106.72 | -0.05 | -0.05% |
| iShares Intermediate Govt/Crdt Bd ETF | |||
| BTA | 8.94 | -0.01 | -0.12% |
| Blackrock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust | |||
| TVAL | 33.26 | -0.11 | -0.33% |
| T. Rowe Price Value ETF | |||