Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PONAX vs WFCPX
PONAX vs WFCPX Comparison
Open Charts PONAX vs WFCPX
PONAX vs WFCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 228B vs. WFCPX (1.17B). PONAX (5.43) and WFCPX (5.26) have matching dividends . PONAX was incepted earlier than WFCPX: PONAX (19 years) vs WFCPX (5 years). PONAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than WFCPX (0.04). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. WFCPX (315.00). WFCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: WFCPX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. WFCPX (5.46). PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.92 vs. WFCPX (5.67).
| PONAX | WFCPX | PONAX / WFCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.04 | 2,350% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.201 | 1.030 | 117% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228B | 1.17B | 19,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 5.26 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 5.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.99 | 17.37 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | 5.67 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFP | 20.38 | -0.08 | -0.39% |
| FLAHERTY & CRUMRINE DYNAMIC PREFERRED AND Income FUND | |||
| JTEK | 105.42 | -0.48 | -0.46% |
| JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF | |||
| TIPZ | 52.17 | -0.32 | -0.61% |
| PIMCO Broad US TIPS ETF | |||
| TALV | 27.57 | -0.30 | -1.07% |
| Transamerica Large Value Active ETF | |||
| BBYY | 10.33 | -0.30 | -2.82% |
| Graniteshares YieldBOOST Baba ETF | |||