It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
POWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
POWL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
POWL (@Electrical Products) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while PSMT (@Discount Stores) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.
POWL is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.
PSMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
@Discount Stores (-0.13% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
POWL | PSMT | POWL / PSMT | |
Capitalization | 1.7B | 3.36B | 51% |
EBITDA | 95.4M | 300M | 32% |
Gain YTD | 7.293 | 17.444 | 42% |
P/E Ratio | 21.41 | 22.99 | 93% |
Revenue | 766M | 5.17B | 15% |
Total Cash | 355M | 262M | 135% |
Total Debt | 1.22M | 248M | 0% |
POWL | PSMT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PSMT's Valuation (63) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as POWL (73) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to POWL’s over the last 12 months.
PSMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as POWL (39) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to POWL’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's SMR Rating (26) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSMT (60) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSMT’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as PSMT (48) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to PSMT’s over the last 12 months.
PSMT's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as POWL (52) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to POWL’s over the last 12 months.
POWL | PSMT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago85% | 5 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POWL has been loosely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POWL jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
POWL | 100% | +2.83% | ||
HUBB - POWL | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
VRT - POWL | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
NVT - POWL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
AEIS - POWL | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
AYI - POWL | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSMT and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSMT and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSMT | 100% | +0.34% | ||
BMRRY - PSMT | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
BJ - PSMT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
COST - PSMT | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
TBBB - PSMT | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
WMMVY - PSMT | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
More |