Advertisement
AEIS vs POWL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) vs. Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both AEIS and POWL operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, benefiting from industrial sector tailwinds.
- POWL shows superior year-to-date gains of approximately 159% compared to AEIS's 83%, reflecting stronger recent momentum.
- POWL exhibits higher return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) at 32% and virtually no debt, enhancing financial stability.
- AEIS leverages demand from AI and data centers, with recent earnings beats driving sentiment.
- Both stocks have delivered triple-digit one-year returns, outperforming broader markets amid sector growth.
- POWL's lower beta (0.82 vs. 1.35) suggests relatively lower volatility compared to AEIS.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines AEIS and POWL, two leaders in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Both have posted exceptional gains in recent market activity, fueled by demand for power management solutions in AI infrastructure, energy transition, and industrial applications. Growth-oriented traders and investors seeking exposure to high-momentum industrials may find value in analyzing their relative performance, financial health, and sector positioning. This analysis highlights key contrasts to aid informed decision-making in the current environment.
AEIS Overview and Recent Performance
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) designs, manufactures, and sells precision power conversion, measurement, and control solutions for semiconductors, data centers, and industrial applications. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $384, reflecting robust gains with year-to-date returns of about 83% and one-year appreciation exceeding 295%. Sentiment has been bolstered by a recent quarterly earnings beat, where revenues rose year-over-year and margins expanded, alongside growing demand from AI-driven data centers. Broader market activity in semiconductors has supported upward price behavior, though higher beta indicates sensitivity to sector volatility.
POWL Overview and Recent Performance
Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) develops, designs, manufactures, and services custom-engineered equipment and systems for electrical energy management, serving oil & gas, petrochemicals, utilities, and mining sectors. Recently trading near $275, the stock has surged with year-to-date returns of roughly 159% and one-year gains over 333%. Positive momentum stems from analyst upgrades, strong quarterly earnings that exceeded expectations, and a substantial backlog signaling revenue visibility. Recent market dips were shallow relative to peers, underscoring resilient performance amid industrial demand.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which deploy diverse strategies across thousands of tickers. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—based on metrics like win rates (57-68%), annualized returns (up to +98%), profit factors, and Sharpe ratios—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with +84-98% annualized returns trading 1-6 tickers on 5-60 minute timeframes, and AI infrastructure agents with +87% returns across 7 tickers using corridor take-profit/stop-loss setups. These bots vary in style from signal generation to virtual portfolio management, helping traders adapt to volatility. Explore the page to identify bots aligned with your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEIS and POWL share sector exposure but diverge in business focus: AEIS emphasizes precision power for high-tech semis and data centers, while POWL targets rugged systems for energy and utilities. Growth drivers for AEIS include AI catalysts, contrasting POWL's backlog from traditional industrials. Recent momentum favors POWL with steeper YTD climbs and 30-day surges around 33%, versus AEIS's steady tech-fueled rise. Risk profiles differ: POWL offers lower beta and debt/equity near 0%, with superior ROE (32% vs. 12%) and profit margins (17% vs. 8%), but trades at a comparable price-to-sales ratio. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with analysts highlighting POWL's undervaluation and AEIS's growth potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor POWL in the current environment, given its consistent trend strength, superior relative performance, pristine balance sheet, and higher profitability metrics. While AEIS benefits from AI tailwinds, POWL's lower risk and momentum edge position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEIS is a Hold and POWL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEIS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOWL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AEIS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- POWL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEIS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEIS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- POWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AEIS (@Electrical Products) experienced а -7.21% price change this week, while POWL (@Electrical Products) price change was -9.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEIS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
POWL is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-2.22% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| AEIS | POWL | AEIS / POWL | |
| Capitalization | 12.5B | 8.97B | 139% |
| EBITDA | 284M | 232M | 122% |
| Gain YTD | 66.372 | 163.759 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 80.71 | 60.08 | 134% |
| Revenue | 1.91B | 1.13B | 168% |
| Total Cash | 700M | 545M | 128% |
| Total Debt | 683M | 1.96M | 34,936% |
AEIS | POWL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEIS's Valuation (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as POWL (88) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew similarly to POWL’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as AEIS (16) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's SMR Rating (33) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as AEIS (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as AEIS (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as AEIS (31) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
| AEIS | POWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 25 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
AEIS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEIS has been loosely correlated with POWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEIS jumps, then POWL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEIS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEIS | 100% | N/A | ||
| POWL - AEIS | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RUN - AEIS | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BE - AEIS | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.43% | ||
| AYI - AEIS | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| LTBR - AEIS | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
POWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POWL has been loosely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POWL jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | 100% | N/A | ||
| VRT - POWL | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| AEIS - POWL | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENS - POWL | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| PLPC - POWL | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NVT - POWL | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.90% | ||
More | ||||