Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$20.04
Change-$0.39 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.6B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.46
Change-$0.84 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.75B
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PPSFX (3.6B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMEBX (1.21) vs PPSFX (0.93). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.12 vs. PPSFX (-1.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.45 vs. PPSFX (44.87).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.442 | 3.121 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 105B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.45 | 5.12 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.64 | 19.95 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.87 | 58.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.03 | 60.74 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement