Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$21.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.52B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PPSFX (3.52B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMEBX (1.09) vs PPSFX (0.84). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. PPSFX (1.10). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. PPSFX (39.46).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.178 | 12.681 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 111B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 6.63 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 33.39 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.46 | 57.72 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.71 | 94.26 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement