Ad is loading...
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$19.38
Change+$1.30 (+7.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.41B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. PPSFX (3.41B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMEBX (1.18) vs PPSFX (0.90). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. PPSFX (-11.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. PPSFX (30.62).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.07 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.111 | -7.747 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 92.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.18 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | -4.56 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.99 | -1.07 | 1,023% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.62 | 44.36 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.45 | 44.99 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers