Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$20.46
Change-$0.23 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. PPSFX (3.51B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMEBX (1.16) vs PPSFX (0.90). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. PPSFX (1.95). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. PPSFX (40.54).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.721 | 5.923 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 107B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 8.54 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.72 | 27.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.54 | 58.69 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.58 | 68.22 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement