PRTS
Price
$6.27
Change
-$0.14 (-2.18%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
51.91M
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
W
Price
$84.41
Change
-$0.64 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.22B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRTS vs W

PRTS vs W Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRTS vs. W commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRTS is a Hold and W is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (PRTS: $6.41 vs. W: $85.04)
Brand notoriety: PRTS: Not notable vs. W: Notable
PRTS represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while W is part of the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRTS: 9% vs. W: 73%
Market capitalization -- PRTS: $51.91M vs. W: $11.22B
PRTS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $51.91M. W’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $11.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $70.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.5T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $83.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PRTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRTS is a better buy in the long-term than W.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • W’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, W is a better buy in the short-term than PRTS.

Price Growth

PRTS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.29% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

W is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.34% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Internet Retail (-2.49% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
W($11.2B) has a higher market cap than PRTS($51.9M). PRTS YTD gains are higher at: 28.200 vs. W (-15.307). W has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 128M vs. PRTS (-16.94M). W has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRTS (37.9M). PRTS has less debt than W: PRTS (52.8M) vs W (3.64B). W has higher revenues than PRTS: W (12.7B) vs PRTS (532M).
PRTSWPRTS / W
Capitalization51.9M11.2B0%
EBITDA-16.94M128M-13%
Gain YTD28.200-15.307-184%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue532M12.7B4%
Total Cash37.9M1.06B4%
Total Debt52.8M3.64B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRTS vs W: Fundamental Ratings
PRTS
W
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRTS's Valuation (36) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for W (100). This means that PRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than W’s over the last 12 months.

PRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as W (100). This means that PRTS’s stock grew similarly to W’s over the last 12 months.

PRTS's SMR Rating (99) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as W (100). This means that PRTS’s stock grew similarly to W’s over the last 12 months.

W's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as PRTS (58). This means that W’s stock grew similarly to PRTS’s over the last 12 months.

PRTS's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as W (93). This means that PRTS’s stock grew similarly to W’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRTSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
W
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYRAX51.29N/A
N/A
Rydex Retailing H
JPPEX68.91N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity R6
GATCX43.73N/A
N/A
Gabelli Asset C
ALCZX23.62N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities Z
MCCRX18.59N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R3

PRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRTS has been loosely correlated with SE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRTS jumps, then SE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRTS
1D Price
Change %
PRTS100%
+1.18%
SE - PRTS
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
CVNA - PRTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
EBAY - PRTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.05%
GLBE - PRTS
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
W - PRTS
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
More

W and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, W has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if W jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To W
1D Price
Change %
W100%
-3.93%
CVNA - W
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
BBBY - W
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
RVLV - W
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.59%
DIBS - W
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
AMZN - W
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
More