PSCC
Price
$34.52
Change
-$0.50 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
34.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLP
Price
$83.70
Change
-$1.89 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSCC vs XLP

Header iconPSCC vs XLP Comparison
Open Charts PSCC vs XLPBanner chart's image
PSCC vs XLP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) vs. State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP)

Key Takeaways

  • PSCC targets small-cap consumer staples via the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Consumer Staples Index, offering higher growth potential but elevated volatility compared to XLP's large-cap focus.
  • XLP provides broad exposure to S&P 500 consumer staples giants, with superior liquidity, lower expense ratio (0.08% vs. 0.29%), and larger diversification across 36 holdings.
  • PSCC's top holdings like LW and PSMT emphasize niche food and distribution, while XLP is dominated by retail leaders such as WMT and COST.
  • Both ETFs exhibit defensive sector exposure, but PSCC's small-cap tilt introduces greater sensitivity to economic cycles and interest rate shifts.
  • XLP demonstrates tighter bid-ask spreads and higher trading volume, enhancing its appeal for tactical sector rotation strategies.
  • Recent market rotations into defensives have favored large-cap stability, positioning XLP with more consistent trend alignment.

Introduction

Comparing the Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) highlights key trade-offs in consumer staples exposure. PSCC delivers targeted access to small-cap names within this defensive sector, appealing to investors seeking growth from nimble operators amid sector rotation. XLP, conversely, tracks large-cap leaders from the S&P 500, prioritizing stability, liquidity, and dividend reliability. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary strategies: PSCC for higher-risk/higher-reward small-cap bets, and XLP for core defensive positioning. In the current environment of macroeconomic uncertainty and interest rate vigilance, this ETF comparison underscores diversification options within resilient consumer staples, where capital flows favor low-volatility havens during broader market cycles.

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) Overview

The Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is a passively managed fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Consumer Staples Index, a float-adjusted, market-cap-weighted benchmark of small-capitalization U.S. consumer staples companies. It invests at least 90% of assets in index securities, with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution to maintain alignment. As of recent data, PSCC holds 24 stocks, with the top 10 comprising about 65% of assets: LW (12.8%), PSMT (8.4%), COCO (7.2%), CALM (7.3%), and FRPT (6.9%). Sector allocations emphasize food products (42%), distribution/retail (25%), and household products (14%). The expense ratio is 0.29%, with AUM around $34 million. Average daily volume stands at 5,200 shares, and median bid-ask spread is 0.22%, reflecting moderate liquidity for its niche focus. As a non-diversified small-cap vehicle, PSCC suits investors targeting thematic growth in essential goods providers.

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) Overview

The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) passively replicates the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, comprising large-cap U.S. staples from the S&P 500, classified under GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) consumer staples. It undergoes quarterly rebalancing to apply capping for diversification. XLP features 36 holdings, with top 10 at 63%: WMT (12.1%), COST (9.5%), PG (7.2%), KO (6.4%), and PM (5.4%). Allocations include distribution/retail (34%), beverages (20%), food products (17%), and household products (16%). With a low expense ratio of 0.08% and AUM exceeding $14.6 billion, XLP offers exceptional liquidity: daily volume over 2 million shares and 0.01% median bid-ask spread. This structure positions it as a benchmark for sector exposure, emphasizing stable megacaps with robust dividends.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer staples sector thrives on inelastic demand for essentials like food, beverages, and household goods, acting as a defensive buffer amid economic volatility. Recent catalysts include record inflows—over $3.6 billion in four weeks—driven by de-risking from cyclicals, fiscal stimulus, and events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup boosting volumes. Macro drivers such as moderating inflation and lower interest rates support margins, though risks persist: input cost pressures, shifting consumer preferences toward value, and regulatory scrutiny on pricing power. Capital flows favor large-cap stability, but small-caps could benefit from nimble adaptation. Geopolitical tensions indirectly aid via commodity hedges, yet tariff threats loom. Sector earnings growth hovers at 6% for 2026, with defensives gaining traction in rotation plays.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, consumer staples have rallied amid broader market rotations toward defensives, with XLP posting steady gains around 9% YTD through early May 2026, buoyed by resilient earnings from top holdings like WMT and COST. PSCC has shown similar YTD traction near 9.5% but with higher volatility due to small-cap sensitivity, connecting to earnings cycles in niche players like LW. Over recent market cycles, XLP's large-cap bias yields lower beta (around 0.6) and smoother relative positioning, outperforming in downturns via dividend consistency. PSCC, while volatile, captures small-cap upside during expansions. Interest rate expectations favor XLP's stability, while commodity trends aid both; however, PSCC's capped structure tempers concentration risk.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like ETFs. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like consumer staples.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLP due to its structural advantages: lower expense ratio, broader diversification, superior liquidity, and alignment with ongoing capital flows into large-cap defensives. PSCC offers compelling small-cap growth potential but trails in cost efficiency and trend consistency amid heightened volatility. Probabilistic edge tilts 65% toward XLP for relative positioning in the prevailing macro environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PSCC vs. XLP commentary
Jun 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCC is a Hold and XLP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLP has more net assets: 14.4B vs. PSCC (34.7M). PSCC has a higher annual dividend yield than XLP: PSCC (11.465) vs XLP (8.330). PSCC was incepted earlier than XLP: PSCC (16 years) vs XLP (28 years). XLP (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than PSCC (0.29). PSCC has a higher turnover XLP (8.00) vs XLP (8.00).
PSCCXLPPSCC / XLP
Gain YTD11.4658.330138%
Net Assets34.7M14.4B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.290.08362%
Turnover26.008.00325%
Yield2.102.6280%
Fund Existence16 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSCCXLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAT24.890.06
+0.24%
Saratoga Investment Corp
DVXC26.73N/A
N/A
WEBs Communication Svcs XLC Dfnd Vol ETF
NBCM27.35-0.20
-0.73%
Neuberger Commodity Stgy ETF
ACWV119.51-1.51
-1.25%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
DOGG21.41-0.36
-1.65%
FT Vest DJIA® Dogs 10 Trgt Inc ETF

XLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLP has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLP jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLP
1D Price
Change %
XLP100%
-2.23%
CL - XLP
73%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
PG - XLP
71%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
MDLZ - XLP
66%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PEP - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
CHD - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More