| PSTR | QYLD | PSTR / QYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 13.529 | 10.124 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 67.2M | 8.36B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.60 | 177% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 24.46 | 196% |
| Yield | 4.73 | 9.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
| PSTR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 26 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QCAP | 25.09 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr | |||
| DFEB | 51.31 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb | |||
| CPST | 28.06 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep | |||
| JHCR | 24.91 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| JHancock Core Bond ETF | |||
| EFU | 6.75 | -0.11 | -1.63% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSTR and PLTR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSTR and PLTR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSTR | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| PLTR - PSTR | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| META - PSTR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| LMT - PSTR | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CRM - PSTR | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| FTNT - PSTR | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| LRCX - QYLD | 66% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| KLAC - QYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AMAT - QYLD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ASML - QYLD | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TSLA - QYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
More | ||||