PTHRF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
453.03M
WDS
Price
$15.34
Change
-$0.12 (-0.78%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.38B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTHRF vs WDS

Header iconPTHRF vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts PTHRF vs WDSBanner chart's image
Pantheon Resources
Price$0.33
Change-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Volume$402.5K
Capitalization453.03M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$15.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.78%)
Volume$17.03K
Capitalization29.38B
PTHRF vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PTHRF vs. WDS commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTHRF is a Hold and WDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PTHRF: $0.33 vs. WDS: $15.46)
Brand notoriety: PTHRF and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PTHRF: 111% vs. WDS: 105%
Market capitalization -- PTHRF: $453.03M vs. WDS: $29.38B
PTHRF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $453.03M. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $29.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $120.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PTHRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PTHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than PTHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PTHRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PTHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the short-term than PTHRF.

Price Growth

PTHRF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+4.10% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($29.4B) has a higher market cap than PTHRF($453M). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 5.888 vs. PTHRF (-12.200).
PTHRFWDSPTHRF / WDS
Capitalization453M29.4B2%
EBITDAN/A9.55B-
Gain YTD-12.2005.888-207%
P/E RatioN/A10.02-
RevenueN/A13.8B-
Total CashN/A5.15B-
Total DebtN/A13.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PTHRF vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
PTHRF
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9564
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
691
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTHRF (83). This means that WDS’s stock grew significantly faster than PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PTHRF (95). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PTHRF (94). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PTHRF (64). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PTHRF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDS (91). This means that PTHRF’s stock grew significantly faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTHRFWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQP167.97N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF
SPYX54.17-0.27
-0.50%
SPDR® S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Rsrv Free ETF
SPDV34.45-0.30
-0.87%
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
DFEN62.96-0.75
-1.18%
Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF
FPXE31.75-0.48
-1.50%
First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF

PTHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTHRF and AAVVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTHRF and AAVVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTHRF
1D Price
Change %
PTHRF100%
-3.73%
AAVVF - PTHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
CNQ - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
WDS - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
TRMLF - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BSM - PTHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
+0.78%
VET - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNQ - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
FANG - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
BTE - WDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
CHRD - WDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
More