PTHRF
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.01 (+2.78%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
125.93M
WDS
Price
$15.46
Change
-$0.16 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.83B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTHRF vs WDS

Header iconPTHRF vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts PTHRF vs WDSBanner chart's image
Pantheon Resources
Price$0.37
Change+$0.01 (+2.78%)
Volume$34.2K
Capitalization125.93M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$15.46
Change-$0.16 (-1.02%)
Volume$506.71K
Capitalization37.83B
PTHRF vs WDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PTHRF vs. WDS commentary
Jun 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTHRF is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2025
Stock price -- (PTHRF: $0.37 vs. WDS: $15.46)
Brand notoriety: PTHRF and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PTHRF: 6% vs. WDS: 54%
Market capitalization -- PTHRF: $125.93M vs. WDS: $37.83B
PTHRF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $125.93M. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $37.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PTHRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PTHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than PTHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PTHRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PTHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PTHRF is a better buy in the short-term than WDS.

Price Growth

PTHRF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +6.47% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+4.64% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($37.8B) has a higher market cap than PTHRF($126M). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 2.710 vs. PTHRF (-1.853).
PTHRFWDSPTHRF / WDS
Capitalization126M37.8B0%
EBITDAN/A7.67B-
Gain YTD-1.8532.710-68%
P/E RatioN/A23.00-
RevenueN/A14B-
Total CashN/A1.95B-
Total DebtN/A6.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PTHRF vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
PTHRF
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8563
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTHRF (88). This means that WDS’s stock grew significantly faster than PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as PTHRF (85). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PTHRF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WDS (96). This means that PTHRF’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PTHRF (65). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PTHRF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDS (97). This means that PTHRF’s stock grew significantly faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTHRFWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTI3.930.06
+1.55%
AlTi Global
EBON3.730.05
+1.22%
Ebang International Holdings
GETY1.88-0.01
-0.53%
Getty Images Holdings
DE516.86-3.98
-0.76%
Deere & Company
PBF20.83-0.34
-1.61%
PBF Energy

PTHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTHRF and VRN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTHRF and VRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTHRF
1D Price
Change %
PTHRF100%
+2.21%
VRN - PTHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAVVF - PTHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
CNQ - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
WDS - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
TRMLF - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-1.02%
VET - WDS
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
FANG - WDS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
CNQ - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
CHRD - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
HES - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More