PUBC
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.57M
SBMSF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
10.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PUBC vs SBMSF

Header iconPUBC vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts PUBC vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
Purebase
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$254.39K
Capitalization15.57M
Danakali
Price$0.07
Change+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.13M
PUBC vs SBMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PUBC vs. SBMSF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PUBC is a Hold and SBMSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (PUBC: $0.06 vs. SBMSF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: PUBC and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PUBC: 335% vs. SBMSF: 0%
Market capitalization -- PUBC: $15.57M vs. SBMSF: $10.13M
PUBC [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $15.57M. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $10.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $48.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PUBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PUBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PUBC and SBMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PUBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PUBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the short-term than PUBC.

Price Growth

PUBC (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -37.08% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-0.58% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUBC($15.6M) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($10.1M). PUBC YTD gains are higher at: -18.841 vs. SBMSF (-52.320). PUBC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.34M vs. SBMSF (-4M). PUBC has higher revenues than SBMSF: PUBC (403K) vs SBMSF (87.7K).
PUBCSBMSFPUBC / SBMSF
Capitalization15.6M10.1M154%
EBITDA-1.34M-4M34%
Gain YTD-18.841-52.32036%
P/E RatioN/A42.40-
Revenue403K87.7K460%
Total Cash500N/A-
Total Debt1.72MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUBC vs SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
PUBC
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PUBC's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBMSF (48). This means that PUBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

PUBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (100). This means that PUBC’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PUBC (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to PUBC’s over the last 12 months.

PUBC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (61). This means that PUBC’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PUBC (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to PUBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PUBCSBMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBR70.970.12
+0.18%
Sabine Royalty Trust
ITW258.64-3.85
-1.47%
Illinois Tool Works
VNOM37.79-0.64
-1.67%
Viper Energy
TOYO4.90-0.10
-2.00%
Toyo Co Ltd
XOS3.26-0.52
-13.76%
Xos

PUBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUBC and SNFRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUBC and SNFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUBC
1D Price
Change %
PUBC100%
-26.32%
SNFRF - PUBC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGROF - PUBC
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
YARIY - PUBC
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
NUFMF - PUBC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBMSF - PUBC
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and CBLUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and CBLUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
N/A
CBLUF - SBMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YRAIF - SBMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRDR - SBMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More