PZZA
Price
$34.18
Change
-$1.64 (-4.58%)
Updated
Jul 6, 01:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.18B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WING
Price
$170.00
Change
-$7.98 (-4.48%)
Updated
Jul 6, 01:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.85B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PZZA vs WING

PZZA vs WING Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PZZA vs. WING commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZZA is a Hold and WING is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2026
Stock price -- (PZZA: $35.82 vs. WING: $177.99)
Brand notoriety: PZZA and WING are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PZZA: 29% vs. WING: 36%
Market capitalization -- PZZA: $1.18B vs. WING: $4.85B
PZZA [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.18B. WING’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $199.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PZZA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWING’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PZZA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WING’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the long-term than WING.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PZZA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WING’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PZZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WING’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WING is a better buy in the short-term than PZZA.

Price Growth

PZZA (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.97% price change this week, while WING (@Restaurants) price change was +7.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

WING is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WING($4.85B) has a higher market cap than PZZA($1.18B). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than WING: PZZA (41.39) vs WING (38.70). PZZA YTD gains are higher at: -4.420 vs. WING (-25.084). WING has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 217M vs. PZZA (178M). WING has more cash in the bank: 129M vs. PZZA (39M). PZZA has less debt than WING: PZZA (953M) vs WING (1.27B). PZZA has higher revenues than WING: PZZA (2.01B) vs WING (709M).
PZZAWINGPZZA / WING
Capitalization1.18B4.85B24%
EBITDA178M217M82%
Gain YTD-4.420-25.08418%
P/E Ratio41.3938.70107%
Revenue2.01B709M284%
Total Cash39M129M30%
Total Debt953M1.27B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PZZA vs WING: Fundamental Ratings
PZZA
WING
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2734
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
4100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1084
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZZA's Valuation (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WING (34). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to WING’s over the last 12 months.

WING's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (100). This means that WING’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for WING (100). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than WING’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WING (61). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to WING’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for WING (84). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than WING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PZZAWING
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PZZA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GASFX29.620.54
+1.86%
Hennessy Gas Utility Investor
GCEAX18.400.17
+0.93%
AB Global Core Equity A
FFXFX102.17-0.62
-0.60%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-2
TGVYX56.72-0.65
-1.13%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth Y
SWLGX18.02-0.25
-1.37%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Growth Idx

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
-0.33%
FRSH - PZZA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
DAVE - PZZA
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
CAKE - PZZA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
WING - PZZA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
BROS - PZZA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More

WING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WING has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WING jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WING
1D Price
Change %
WING100%
+1.73%
FRSH - WING
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
CAKE - WING
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
FWRG - WING
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
BJRI - WING
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
CAVA - WING
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.63%
More