Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWMFX
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.71
Change-$0.22 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.35
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. QCACX (2.73B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWMFX (1.42) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWMFX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. RWMFX (7.06). RWMFX (52.63) and QCACX (50.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QCACX | RWMFX | QCACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.31 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.31 | 626% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.426 | 10.714 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.29 | 7.06 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 45.97 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.74 | 52.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.99 | 82.50 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement