Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWMFX
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31B
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. QCACX (2.61B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWMFX (1.43) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWMFX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RWMFX (7.43). RWMFX (53.32) and QCACX (53.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QCACX | RWMFX | QCACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.31 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.31 | 626% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.437 | 9.752 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 7.43 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.06 | 37.81 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.18 | 53.32 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.03 | 88.54 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement