Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWMFX
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.82
Change+$0.55 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.79B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.20
Change+$0.64 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.17B
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. QCACX (2.79B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWMFX (1.41) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWMFX (250) vs QCACX (1500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.55 vs. QCACX (1.56). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.91 vs. QCACX (40.28).
| QCACX | RWMFX | QCACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.31 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.31 | 619% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.612 | 8.823 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | 3.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 28.22 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 44.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.81 | 72.46 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement