Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$32.15
Change+$0.18 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. QCLVX (1.62B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (1.21) vs QCLVX (0.21). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (7 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. QCLVX (-1.76). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. QCLVX (41.34).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.534 | 2.865 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.21 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 5.09 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 17.98 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.34 | 58.06 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement