Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$35.18
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. QCLVX (1.98B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. QCLVX (0.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.63 vs. QCLVX (37.04).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.110 | 14.812 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.05 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.33 | 7.29 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 43.24 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 59.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement