Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$34.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. QCLVX (1.9B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (1.11) vs QCLVX (0.19). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. QCLVX (2.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.09 vs. QCLVX (33.48).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.472 | 11.509 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 6.81 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.43 | 28.69 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.48 | 53.09 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement