Advertisement
QCOM vs WOLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCOM is a Buy and WOLF is a Buy.
| QCOM | WOLF | QCOM / WOLF | |
| Capitalization | 190B | 1.35B | 14,032% |
| EBITDA | 13.5B | -1.48B | -913% |
| Gain YTD | 15.327 | 59.161 | 26% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.31 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 44.1B | 760M | 5,803% |
| Total Cash | 8.3B | 1.17B | 713% |
| Total Debt | 15.3B | 1.82B | 839% |
QCOM | WOLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WOLF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as QCOM (41) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that WOLF’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOLF (100) in the null industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOLF’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's SMR Rating (31) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOLF (100) in the null industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew significantly faster than WOLF’s over the last 12 months.
WOLF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as QCOM (45) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that WOLF’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOLF (100) in the null industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew significantly faster than WOLF’s over the last 12 months.
| QCOM | WOLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QCOM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while WOLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QCOM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WOLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QCOM (@Semiconductors) experienced а +7.82% price change this week, while WOLF (@Semiconductors) price change was +15.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
WOLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+11.26% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ENHI | 27.27 | 0.31 | +1.15% |
| iShares Enhanced International Active ETF (ENHI) | |||
| WAGN | 15.29 | 0.17 | +1.12% |
| Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) | |||
| WAYFX | 20.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Waycross Focused Core Equity Fund | |||
| NUMI | 24.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) | |||
| PTA | 18.02 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
| Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund | |||
WOLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOLF has been loosely correlated with AAOI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOLF jumps, then AAOI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOLF | 100% | +8.28% | ||
| AAOI - WOLF | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| COHU - WOLF | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.96% | ||
| ACLS - WOLF | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| VECO - WOLF | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.51% | ||
| KLIC - WOLF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||