Intraday BUY SELL Signals
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDEF vs WTS
QDEF vs WTS Comparison
Open Charts QDEF vs WTS
QDEF vs WTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDEF vs. WTS commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDEF is a StrongBuy and WTS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WTS: Fundamental Ratings
WTS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDEF | WTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QDEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEF has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDEF jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEF | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| TROW - QDEF | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BX - QDEF | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| WTS - QDEF | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| TXN - QDEF | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| ROP - QDEF | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
WTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTS has been loosely correlated with HLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTS jumps, then HLMN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTS | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| HLMN - WTS | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LECO - WTS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| ROP - WTS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| SWK - WTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| RBC - WTS | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
More | ||||