Advertisement
QDEL vs XGN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDEL is a Hold and XGN is a Hold.
| QDEL | XGN | QDEL / XGN | |
| Capitalization | 809M | 171M | 473% |
| EBITDA | -379M | -11.32M | 3,349% |
| Gain YTD | -58.753 | 15.625 | -376% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.67B | 71.1M | 3,761% |
| Total Cash | 123M | 24.6M | 500% |
| Total Debt | 3.08B | 26M | 11,827% |
QDEL | XGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XGN's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as QDEL (52) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew similarly to QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
XGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QDEL (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew similarly to QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
QDEL's SMR Rating (98) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as XGN (99) in the null industry. This means that QDEL’s stock grew similarly to XGN’s over the last 12 months.
XGN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QDEL (81) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
QDEL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that QDEL’s stock grew significantly faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.
| QDEL | XGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 69% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QDEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XGN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QDEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QDEL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XGN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QDEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- XGN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QDEL (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -15.68% price change this week, while XGN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -7.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
QDEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
XGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Medical Specialties (-3.54% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
Advertisement
QDEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEL has been loosely correlated with AZTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDEL jumps, then AZTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEL | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| AZTA - QDEL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| XRAY - QDEL | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| RVTY - QDEL | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| DHR - QDEL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| A - QDEL | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||
XGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XGN and SHC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XGN and SHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGN | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| SHC - XGN | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| QDEL - XGN | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| MXCT - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| GRAL - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| RDNT - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||