QGRW
Price
$67.62
Change
+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VUG
Price
$88.45
Change
-$0.43 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
384.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QGRW vs VUG

QGRW vs VUG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) vs. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)

Key Takeaways

  • WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) employs a rules-based passive strategy selecting 100 large- and mid-capitalization U.S. stocks scoring highest on combined growth and quality metrics, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio than many broad growth peers.
  • Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) provides broad passive exposure to the large-capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market via full replication of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, typically holding 150 or more securities with significantly lower costs.
  • Both ETFs maintain heavy allocations to technology and communication services sectors, yet QGRW exhibits greater concentration in high-conviction quality-growth names while VUG offers wider diversification across the large-growth universe.
  • Expense ratios differ materially: QGRW charges 0.28 percent annually, whereas VUG charges 0.03 percent, creating a meaningful long-term cost advantage for the latter in comparable market environments.
  • Liquidity profiles favor VUG due to substantially larger assets under management, while both remain fully invested in physical equities without leverage, derivatives overlays, or inverse strategies.
  • Relative positioning favors VUG for cost-efficient core growth exposure and QGRW for investors seeking explicit emphasis on profitability and earnings-growth characteristics within the growth style box.

Introduction

Investors seeking U.S. large-cap growth exposure frequently evaluate QGRW and VUG as complementary or alternative vehicles within the same broad category. Although both target growth-oriented equities, they implement distinct index methodologies that produce measurable differences in concentration, sector emphasis, and cost structure. In the current environment of elevated interest-rate sensitivity and rapid technological innovation, these structural distinctions influence how each fund responds to earnings cycles, sector rotation, and macroeconomic shifts. The comparison highlights durable characteristics relevant across multiple market cycles rather than short-term price fluctuations.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) Overview

The WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. This market-capitalization-weighted index selects the 100 U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies with the highest composite scores on equally weighted growth and quality factors. The fund holds exactly 100 securities and maintains a non-diversified structure that permits concentration when the index favors particular industries. Top holdings typically include NVDA, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Meta Platforms Inc. (META), with technology comprising approximately 50 percent of assets and communication services another 15 percent. The gross and net expense ratio stands at 0.28 percent. Rebalancing occurs according to the index methodology, and the fund remains fully invested in physical equities without leverage or derivatives.

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) Overview

The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index through a full-replication strategy. The index represents the large-capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market and typically contains 150 or more holdings. Top positions generally include NVDA, Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), and Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), with technology and consumer discretionary sectors receiving the largest weights. The expense ratio is 0.03 percent. The fund employs quarterly dividend distributions, maintains full investment in underlying equities, and follows a rules-based rebalancing schedule aligned with the index. Its large asset base supports tight bid-ask spreads and high liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market, where technology innovation, artificial-intelligence adoption, and semiconductor demand remain primary catalysts. Capital flows into growth equities have been supported by expectations of resilient corporate earnings and moderating interest-rate pressures. Regulatory developments around technology competition and data privacy continue to influence sector leaders, while macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and consumer spending patterns affect valuation multiples. Risks include elevated concentration in a handful of mega-cap names, potential slowdowns in technology capital expenditures, and shifts in monetary policy that could pressure growth valuations. These structural themes affect both funds similarly yet manifest differently due to variations in holdings count and selection criteria.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, QGRW has exhibited slightly higher volatility consistent with its more concentrated quality-growth mandate and explicit emphasis on earnings momentum. VUG has delivered broader participation across the large-growth universe, resulting in marginally lower tracking error relative to standard growth benchmarks. In periods of strong technology earnings, both funds benefited from overlapping mega-cap holdings, while QGRW’s quality screen provided incremental differentiation during rotations favoring profitability. Interest-rate expectations and sector momentum have driven relative performance swings, with cost differentials amplifying long-term compounding advantages for the lower-expense vehicle. Diversification differences influence drawdown characteristics during sector-specific corrections.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing growth-oriented ETFs may find the tool useful for refining criteria around sector exposure and volatility profiles.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to VUG for most investors seeking core large-cap growth exposure. The combination of substantially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings, and established liquidity profile supports more consistent long-term risk-adjusted outcomes relative to the higher-cost, more concentrated alternative. QGRW may appeal to investors explicitly prioritizing quality and growth factor tilts within a smaller universe, though the cost differential remains a durable consideration across market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QGRW vs. VUG commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QGRW is a Buy and VUG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VUG has more net assets: 385B vs. QGRW (2.95B). QGRW has a higher annual dividend yield than VUG: QGRW (15.204) vs VUG (8.782). QGRW was incepted earlier than VUG: QGRW (4 years) vs VUG (23 years). VUG (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than QGRW (0.28). QGRW has a higher turnover VUG (12.00) vs VUG (12.00).
QGRWVUGQGRW / VUG
Gain YTD15.2048.782173%
Net Assets2.95B385B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.280.03933%
Turnover40.0012.00333%
Yield0.070.3819%
Fund Existence4 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QGRWVUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QGRW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VUG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBXY23.540.05
+0.20%
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-July
PSCQ32.02N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF
NJUN32.82-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun
KSA38.51-0.02
-0.05%
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
CEF45.27-0.51
-1.11%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust